TPO40
The main topic of both the passage and the lecture is discussing the possibility of a permanent station for human beings to stay on Venus. According to the passage, the author claimed that it is impossible to stay on Venus continually since it has higher pressure than the Earth, no source of water and oxygen, and dim light, while the lecturer found this idea questionable and illustrated the citing at all, citing three reasons to oppose the points in the reading.
First, in the reading, the author claimed that since the pressure at the surface of Venus is all but 90 times higher than the Earth, landing on Venus would be indisputably impractical because landed objects would be crushed at the aforementioned pressure. The lecture, however, highlighted the fact that the station on Venus would not be fixed; rather it would be a floating one on the 50 kilometers above the surface of Venus. At this level, the pressure is equal the Earth; therefore, the pressure differences would not be a problem then.
Second, according to the author, the atmosphere of the planet is mainly consist of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid, and there is no source of water or oxygen; thus, transferring these vital compounds from Earth would be a solution which seems not practical and rejects the idea of building a stable station on Venus. The lecture, on the other hand, suggested that there are several compounds on the atmosphere there, and by this time, some chemical reaction have known, making the production of water and oxygen from the above mentioned materials feasible, as a result, there is not needed more to import them from the Earth.
The last point discussed in the passage has to do with the light on Venus inasmuch as it has thick clouds around, making the penetration of sunlight to the surface hard and only 60 percent of the light hit the surface. In addition, in order to produce power from solar energy, the lack of light could not be neglected, but the lecture argued that since the station would be at 50 kilometers above the surface of Venus, the light would be greater than the surface as there are fewer thick clouds and the light would be received at higher percentages there. Further, the equipment containing solar cells could be designed in the way that they could enjoy not only the direct light but its reflect as well.
All in all, the idea presented in the reading is untenable to three conspicuous reasons which were completely discussed above.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Being creative, rather than planning carefully, helps people come up with the best solution to a problem 93
- Imagine that you are a student at a university where there are long breaks between semesters. The university requires all students to do one of the following for one month during the break.a. Students must take a course which has no direct connection to t 70
- Do you agree or disagree to the following statement?Parents should allow children to make mistakes and let them learn from their own mistakes 90
- Some parents offer their school-age children money for each high grade (mark) they get in school. Do you think this is a good idea?Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- TPO40 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 73, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'consisted'.
Suggestion: consisted
... the atmosphere of the planet is mainly consist of carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfur...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, second, so, then, therefore, thus, well, while, as to, in addition, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.4613686534 210% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 5.04856512141 238% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 15.0 7.30242825607 205% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 22.412803532 76% => OK
Preposition: 61.0 30.3222958057 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 10.0 5.01324503311 199% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2060.0 1373.03311258 150% => OK
No of words: 427.0 270.72406181 158% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.8243559719 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.54576487731 4.04702891845 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53041434958 2.5805825403 98% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 145.348785872 139% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.473067915691 0.540411800872 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 633.6 419.366225166 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 3.25607064018 0% => OK
Article: 13.0 8.23620309051 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 2.5761589404 272% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 38.0 21.2450331126 179% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 85.4419719957 49.2860985944 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 187.272727273 110.228320801 170% => OK
Words per sentence: 38.8181818182 21.698381199 179% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.1818181818 7.06452816374 158% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.488204079807 0.272083759551 179% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.185770678459 0.0996497079465 186% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0834656964805 0.0662205650399 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.237790644621 0.162205337803 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.116243568009 0.0443174109184 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 20.7 13.3589403974 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.37 53.8541721854 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 11.0289183223 153% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.27 12.2367328918 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.22 8.42419426049 109% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 63.6247240618 157% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 10.7273730684 172% => OK
gunning_fog: 17.2 10.498013245 164% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.2008830022 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.