TPO40Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.

Essay topics:

TPO40
Summarize the points made in the lecture, being sure to explain how the proposal discussed in the lecture would solve the specific challenges described in the reading passage.

Both the reading and the lecture discuss whether it is possible for human beings present on Venus in the future. The reading passage implies the statement is highly impossible to practice due to several theories, while the lecturer thinks it is possible for people to live in Venus if a flowing balloon-like station can be installed in the atmosphere of the planet.

First of all, the reading passage suggests that the atmospheric pressure which is at least 90 times greater than the one at Earth's surface is too heavy to make humans survive. However, the lecturer seriously disagrees with the argument by mentioning the height of the balloon-like station. To be more specific, if the craft is established at the height of 50 kilometer, which has an equal atmospheric pressure with Earth, the first question raise by the author could be resolved.

Secondly, the reading implies that the absence of water and oxygen is going to make the absence of humans on Venus. Yet, the scholar strongly challenges such claim by relating the compounds found in the Venus' atmosphere. To elaborate, people could process chemical compounds, such as carbon dioxide, nitrogen, and sulfuric acid, into water and oxygen. Thus, it is not necessary to worry about the the absence of humans' surviving requisites, or the unworkable supplies plan.

Last but not least, the reading suggests that few quantities of sunlight may decrease the likelihood of human beings' living chance. Nevertheless, the professor seriously refutes such statement by talking about the characteristic of the planet's atmosphere. In fact, the place below the cloud is not thick at all, thereby if the station installed in such place, then people could utilize the sunlight to generate electricity without concerning about the thick cloud would suffocate them.

To conclude, the scholar calls each explanation into question. That is to say, he believe it is possible for humans to live on Venus with respect to the practical balloon-like space station.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-09-08 LKL 73 view
2022-07-08 rosedudu 3 view
2021-11-01 mattayousak 3 view
2021-11-01 mattayousak 3 view
2020-11-01 iscaxap 76 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 360, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'kilometer' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'kilometers'.
Suggestion: kilometers
...raft is established at the height of 50 kilometer, which has an equal atmospheric pressur...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: the
...hus, it is not necessary to worry about the the absence of humans surviving requisites,...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 394, Rule ID: DT_DT[1]
Message: Maybe you need to remove one determiner so that only 'the' or 'the' is left.
Suggestion: the; the
...hus, it is not necessary to worry about the the absence of humans surviving requisites,...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 237, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
...talking about the characteristic of the planets atmosphere. In fact, the place below th...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 83, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'he' must be used with a third-person verb: 'believes'.
Suggestion: believes
...ation into question. That is to say, he believe it is possible for humans to live on Ve...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, then, thus, while, at least, in fact, such as, talking about, first of all, with respect to, that is to say

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.4613686534 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 7.30242825607 82% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 22.412803532 45% => OK
Preposition: 54.0 30.3222958057 178% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.01324503311 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1690.0 1373.03311258 123% => OK
No of words: 325.0 270.72406181 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.04702891845 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74573968004 2.5805825403 106% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 145.348785872 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529230769231 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 419.366225166 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 21.2450331126 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.6927806525 49.2860985944 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.714285714 110.228320801 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2142857143 21.698381199 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.3571428571 7.06452816374 175% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.299965745479 0.272083759551 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0950881825055 0.0996497079465 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493971451422 0.0662205650399 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151491562203 0.162205337803 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0317326983191 0.0443174109184 72% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.3589403974 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.8541721854 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.0289183223 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.18 12.2367328918 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.42419426049 102% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 63.6247240618 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 10.7273730684 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.498013245 107% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 11.2008830022 116% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.