TPO41
The reading passage refuses the create of new and strict rules for handling and storing coal ash due to three reasons. The lecurer, however, finds this idea dubious and casts doubt on the reasons mentioned by the reading passage.
First of all, the writer notices that power companies have effective regulations already. On the contrary, the lecturer mentions that these regulations are not apply for any situation. Indeed, companies have to use liners when they construct on a new ponder or landfill, but they do not have any responsibility for the old ones. Therefore, it is very likely that the old ponders or landfill leaks these ashes into the groundwaters and cause serious damages to the environment.
Furthermore, the author of the reading mentions that applying strict regulations may leads to discouraging companies for recycling. In contrast, the professor underlines the fact that these firm rules could not have any effect on costumer use of these products. In continue, she notes that for example, in the past researcher showed that mercury is harmful, but it did not any effect on its popularity among costumers.
Finally, the reading passage mentioned that these rules would increase the price of electricity. On the other hand, the speaker mentions that preventing from environmental damaging outweigh on its higher price. Besides, she mentions that if we do a simple math, we find out that it would raise household electricity price only one precent which is ignoreable.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 29, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
The reading passage refuses the create of new and strict rules for handling an...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 161, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'applied'.
Suggestion: applied
...mentions that these regulations are not apply for any situation. Indeed, companies ha...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, furthermore, however, if, may, so, therefore, for example, in contrast, first of all, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.4613686534 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 12.0772626932 108% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 22.412803532 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 30.3222958057 82% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 241.0 270.72406181 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.20331950207 5.08290768461 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 4.04702891845 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7701438732 2.5805825403 107% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.593360995851 0.540411800872 110% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 419.366225166 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 21.2450331126 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0031563392 49.2860985944 45% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.5 110.228320801 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 21.698381199 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5 7.06452816374 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.27373068433 94% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27977554222 0.272083759551 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0980293359696 0.0996497079465 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0748617991354 0.0662205650399 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156771673761 0.162205337803 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0639591419239 0.0443174109184 144% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.3589403974 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.8541721854 95% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.0289183223 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.88 12.2367328918 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.08 8.42419426049 108% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 63.6247240618 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.498013245 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.2008830022 89% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.