Tpo43
In this set of material, the reading passage states that the agnostids were a group of marine animals that their fossils have found in many areas around the world, however the paleontologists do not know more information about their food or the places of their living. The reading brings three theories and support them, however the lecture find all theories unconvincing and provides some evidence to refute them. The information the professor provides contradicts the fact outlined in the reading.
First, the reading claims that the agnostids may have been free- swimming predators in open oceans that they were eating small animals, in contrast the professor argues that a free-swimming predator requires large eyes with the best vision, however agnostids did not have such large eyes or other organs which could have helped them to sense their pray.
Second, the author of reading contends that agnostids may have lived on the seafloor and have eaten dead organism, on the contrary the lecture believes that brings which live on the seafloor do not have ability to move fast and they are restricted to local area, however agnostids have found in a large scale of areas in the world; hence they were able to move from a place to another place quickly.
Third, the reading passage proposes that agnostids may have been parasites that they were obtaining food from their host, conversely the professor disagrees and expresses that the population of parasites usually is low otherwise their host can feed or kill them, however as the reading has mentioned the population of agnostieds were very larg, consequently they could not have been parasites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-06 | Aliakbari94 | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-05 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-03-02 | taisuke571 | 85 | view |
| 2020-10-31 | nj-me | 70 | view |
| 2020-10-25 | 想不到一个好名字 | 80 | view |
- DO you agree or disagree If a student is having difficulty studying a course it is better for the student to turn to a friend who is good at this course than to turn to his teacher for help 90
- tpo47 70
- TPO27-TPO 27 integrated writing Little ice age 66
- do you agree or disagree? people should take a secure job with low income instead of having high paid job with low security. 90
- TPO35 3
Comments
Essay evaluation report
swimming predators in open oceans that they were eating small animals,
swimming predators in open oceans where they were eating small animals,
the lecture believes that brings which live on the seafloor
the lecture believes that ??? which live on the seafloor //what is 'brings'?
may have been parasites that they were obtaining food from their host,
may have been parasites who were obtaining food from their host,
Sentence: In this set of material, the reading passage states that the agnostids were a group of marine animals that their fossils have found in many areas around the world, however the paleontologists do not know more information about their food or the places of their living.
Error: agnostids Suggestion: agnostics
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
-----------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 23 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 6 12
No. of Words: 271 250
No. of Characters: 1356 1200
No. of Different Words: 137 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.057 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.004 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.461 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 89 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 72 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 30 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 45.167 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 21.497 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.833 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.52 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.808 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.273 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4
Discourse Markers used:
['consequently', 'conversely', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'in contrast', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.257731958763 0.261695866417 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.19587628866 0.158904122519 123% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0618556701031 0.0723426182421 86% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0549828178694 0.0435111971325 126% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0515463917526 0.0277247811725 186% => OK
Prepositions: 0.113402061856 0.128828473217 88% => OK
Participles: 0.0515463917526 0.0370669169778 139% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49147181722 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.020618556701 0.0208969081088 99% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.116838487973 0.128158765124 91% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.020618556701 0.0158828679856 130% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00687285223368 0.0114777025283 60% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1658.0 1645.83664459 101% => OK
No of words: 271.0 271.125827815 100% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11808118081 6.08160592843 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 4.04852973271 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.343173431734 0.374372842146 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.276752767528 0.287516216867 96% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.188191881919 0.187439937562 100% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.118081180812 0.113142543107 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49147181722 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.523985239852 0.539623497131 97% => OK
Word variations: 51.3098003185 53.8517498576 95% => OK
How many sentences: 6.0 13.0529801325 46% => More sentences wanted.
Sentence length: 45.1666666667 21.7502111507 208% => Sentence lengths are too long.
Sentence length SD: 121.986338033 49.3711431718 247% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 276.333333333 132.220823453 209% => Less chars per sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 45.1666666667 21.7502111507 208% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 1.83333333333 0.878197800319 209% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 3.39072847682 0% => OK
Readability: 72.8419434194 50.5018328374 144% => OK
Elegance: 1.39772727273 1.90840788429 73% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.597987583252 0.549887131256 109% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.21262277692 0.142949733639 149% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0752849819582 0.0787303798458 96% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.841498245906 0.631733273073 133% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.174684352188 0.139662658121 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.358475086184 0.266732575781 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.124234766004 0.103435571967 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.375028607937 0.414875509568 90% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0225285605024 0.0530846634433 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.439109623491 0.40443939384 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0313865703952 0.0528353158467 59% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.26048565121 23% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 2.0 3.49668874172 57% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 3.1766004415 31% => OK
Total topic words: 6.0 10.2958057395 58% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.