TPO44
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether coin which is found in the North America is a historical coin or not. The reading says that this coin is a fake type and maybe it was placed by a person last years, so it provides some reasons. In contrast, the lecture refutes whole providing reasons and states that there several historical reasons which this coin is relating to the Norse.
First, great distance from Norse region. The reading claims that the finding coin place has a very large distance from other Norse sites, thus it is not for them. However, the lecturer says that many other objects have brought to the Maine not just a coin; hence it is a historical reason to being the coin belonging to the Norse.
In addition, there is only one coin in this place without anything else. According to the reading, because of being just one discovering coin, so the Norse have not brought any silver coins there by themselves. On the other hand, the professor states that it is not necessary to exist other coin here. Since they have brought other coin to the North America, but when they had come back to the Europe, the return all of them, as a result there is not any coin in the Maine.
Finally, they did not use coin as money. The passage suggests that the Norse did not apply them in the life-day and in fact, they were useless at that time. In contrast, the speaker states that they did not use the coins as money, but appeal as neglect and other jewel applications, because of being beauty inherently.
In summary, although the reading provides some reasons for non-being the coin as a historical evidence, the professor refutes all of them by providing some special reasons.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, hence, however, if, may, so, thus, in addition, in contrast, in fact, in summary, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 5.04856512141 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 12.0772626932 91% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 22.412803532 116% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1373.03311258 102% => OK
No of words: 302.0 270.72406181 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65562913907 5.08290768461 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.04702891845 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27066382679 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 145.348785872 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.466887417219 0.540411800872 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.9 419.366225166 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.55342163355 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 10.0 8.23620309051 121% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.25165562914 399% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 1.51434878587 132% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 2.5761589404 349% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 21.2450331126 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.3040979349 49.2860985944 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.428571429 110.228320801 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5714285714 21.698381199 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.5 7.06452816374 134% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 4.45695364238 45% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.27373068433 187% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.465352950205 0.272083759551 171% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.1833366056 0.0996497079465 184% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0653003373385 0.0662205650399 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.265569253694 0.162205337803 164% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0898294257011 0.0443174109184 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 13.3589403974 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.8541721854 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.75 12.2367328918 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.29 8.42419426049 87% => OK
difficult_words: 50.0 63.6247240618 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 10.7273730684 98% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.498013245 99% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.