TPO44
The article states that coins found in North America are not a genuine piece of historical evidence, cultivating an impression that Norse could not have traveled long distances. However, the professor disagrees. She explains that coins are not fake and Maine and Norse would have come into contact, leading them to trade genuine coins.
First, the author suggests that discovered coins have been found in the far eastern part of Canada.
The argument is challenged by the lecturer. She says that many other objects that have been brought by Norse, which can be considered as reasonable evidence. Furthermore, she argues that due to the fact that Norse traveled great distances, they could have reached North America.
Second, the writer contends that Norse would not have brought coins along with themselves, pointing that fact that no coins have not been discovered in North America.
The speaker, however, rebuts this by asserting that if no coins have been discovered in Canada, that is not to say Norse have not used coins. She elaborates on this issue by mentioning that Norse were not permanent settlements, for when they decided to back to Europe, they might have packed up all coins and brought back them with themselves.
Third, it is stated in the article that coins brought by Norse were merely used in Europe. The author establishes the fact that coins have not been recognized by North American. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that Norse people were interested in unusual objects. They were fascinated by the beauty of the neckless and jewelry. She puts forth that idea that Norse could have used coins to trade these objects.
- TPO44 73
- The most important problem affecting the society can be solved during my lifetime 89
- Do you agree or disagree? It is more important to keep your old friends rather than making new friends. 78
- Some people think the media (including newspaper, televisions, radio, and internet sources) are less concerned with the accuracy of news. Some people think the information from the media are becoming incorrect. Do you agree or disagree with this opinion o 85
- You have long been friend with someone. If they do something that you don’t like, should you still be friends with him or her？ 86
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, however, if, second, so, third, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.4613686534 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 7.30242825607 55% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 21.0 12.0772626932 174% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 22.412803532 161% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 30.3222958057 96% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1391.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 275.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.05818181818 5.08290768461 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40897495433 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 135.0 145.348785872 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490909090909 0.540411800872 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 418.5 419.366225166 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 3.25607064018 307% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 8.0 8.23620309051 97% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 21.2450331126 85% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.1660770119 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7333333333 110.228320801 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 21.698381199 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.93333333333 7.06452816374 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.09492273731 147% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.493214503025 0.272083759551 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.181249982252 0.0996497079465 182% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116430503508 0.0662205650399 176% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.299175236112 0.162205337803 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696789722689 0.0443174109184 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 13.3589403974 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.8541721854 115% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.0289183223 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.2367328918 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.03 8.42419426049 95% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 63.6247240618 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 10.7273730684 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.498013245 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.