TPO45
The reading and the lecture both discuss whether Bees have existed 200 million years ago or not. The reading says that the structures, which have discovered in Arizona, it is not relating to the Bees. However, the professor refutes this argument and states that there are several reasons that Bees have been about 200 million years ago.
First, there are no fossils of actual Bees. According to the reading, the first fossils of bees return to 100 million years ago and it is not accepted that bee have live 200 million years ago. In contrast, the lecturer refutes this statement by saying the trees which have been at that time could produce a liquid, then the bees could not preserve themselves against this liquid.
In addition, no existing flowering plants 200 million years ago. The passage claims that bees and flowering plants have a special relationship and in fact the bees use these plants as food, while the first flowering plants have existed from 125 million years ago. However, the professor states that although the bees and flowering plants have close relationship, bees at that time have used other plants as food like pant plants. Indeed, the consumers of flowering plans by bees have been starting since the evolutionary plant age.
Finally, the discovered fossils have a similarity with modern bees, but they are different in details. The reading says that for instance chambers of modern bee nest have another pattern relative to the fossil structure. On the other hand, the speaker argues that by analyzing the fossil, the experts have found they are the same. Moreover, in water proofing ability, they are similar to each other.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-07 | D.Dgfd | 75 | view |
| 2021-09-20 | Aliakbari94 | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | mgh9271 | 70 | view |
| 2020-11-14 | Masoome shahsavari | view | |
| 2020-11-05 | 2020 | 70 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, however, if, moreover, so, then, while, for instance, in addition, in contrast, in fact, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.4613686534 96% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 5.04856512141 40% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 22.412803532 89% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 30.3222958057 89% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.01324503311 80% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1388.0 1373.03311258 101% => OK
No of words: 277.0 270.72406181 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01083032491 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.04702891845 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.31490999248 2.5805825403 90% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 145.348785872 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501805054152 0.540411800872 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 419.366225166 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 3.25607064018 61% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.116997792494 0% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.25165562914 80% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 2.5761589404 194% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0662251656 107% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7348807695 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1428571429 110.228320801 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7857142857 21.698381199 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06452816374 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 4.19205298013 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0698231867899 0.272083759551 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.030071370925 0.0996497079465 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0191813238448 0.0662205650399 29% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0477757840021 0.162205337803 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0120233510408 0.0443174109184 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.3589403974 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.8541721854 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 11.0289183223 86% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.2367328918 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.42419426049 94% => OK
difficult_words: 59.0 63.6247240618 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 10.7273730684 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.