TPO7-integrated task
Both the article and the lecture discuss the ecocertification which is given to wood companies that meet high ecological standards. On one hand, the article argues that wood companies in the U.S are not likely to adopt this certification. On the other hand, the professor opposes by stating that there are good reasons that Americans companies will seek for the certification.
First and foremost, the reading claims that Americans customers are exposed to too much advertising and as a result, the ecocertification label wouldn't be able to catch their attention. However, the professor refutes this point by saying that consumers don't treat all advertisements in the same way. He states that the Americans really have great confidence in advertisements approved by the independent consumer agency and most of them have a positive reaction to wood products.
In addition, the article posits that U.S companies wouldn't choose to obtain the ecocertification because ecocertified wood will be more costly that uncertified wood. Nonetheless, the professor casts doubt on this point by emphasizing that price is just one of the qualities that companies take into their consideration. According to the professor, If the additional cost is lest that five percents, companies are more prone taking other factors than price into account.
Last but not least, the author of the reading indicates that most of American wood companies sell their product inside the country so that they don't have the urge to catch up with the up-to-date developments in the rest of the world. In contrast, the professor rebuts this argument. He acknowledges that U.S wood companies should pay attention to the developments because of their foreign opponents. This is because a slow capturing customers' favor company won't stand a chance with foreign companies which penetrates the US's market with certified wood.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-07-01 | Thien Nhan | 86 | view |
- Every generation of people is different in important ways. How is your generation different from your parents’ generation?Use specific reasons and examples to explain your answer. 81
- TPO9 - integrated task 86
- What is your approach to problem-solving, and how does it work for you? Use specific details to support your response. 86
- Many parts of the world are losing important natural resources, such as forests, animals, or clean water. Choose one resource that is disappearing and explain why it needs to be saved.Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? The best way to travel is in a group led by a tour guide. 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Both the article and the lecture discuss...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 204, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...cle argues that wood companies in the U.S are not likely to adopt this certificat...
^
Line 1, column 388, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...panies will seek for the certification. First and foremost, the reading...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a positive reaction to wood products. In addition, the article posits ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 48, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... In addition, the article posits that U.S companies wouldn't choose to obtai...
^
Line 5, column 485, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... other factors than price into account. Last but not least, the author ...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 322, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
...s this argument. He acknowledges that U.S wood companies should pay attention to ...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'nonetheless', 'really', 'so', 'in addition', 'in contrast', 'as a result', 'in the same way', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.275071633238 0.261695866417 105% => OK
Verbs: 0.14899713467 0.158904122519 94% => OK
Adjectives: 0.080229226361 0.0723426182421 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0286532951289 0.0435111971325 66% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0229226361032 0.0277247811725 83% => OK
Prepositions: 0.12893982808 0.128828473217 100% => OK
Participles: 0.025787965616 0.0370669169778 70% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.16108095013 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Infinitives: 0.025787965616 0.0208969081088 123% => OK
Particles: 0.00286532951289 0.00154638098197 185% => OK
Determiners: 0.120343839542 0.128158765124 94% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00859598853868 0.0158828679856 54% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00859598853868 0.0114777025283 75% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2036.0 1645.83664459 124% => OK
No of words: 298.0 271.125827815 110% => OK
Chars per words: 6.8322147651 6.08160592843 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.04852973271 103% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.375838926174 0.374372842146 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.308724832215 0.287516216867 107% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.234899328859 0.187439937562 125% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.211409395973 0.113142543107 187% => Too many words length more than 8 chars.
Word Length SD: 3.16108095013 2.5805825403 122% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 145.348785872 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.540268456376 0.539623497131 100% => OK
Word variations: 55.51617078 53.8517498576 103% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 13.0529801325 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.9230769231 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7388212873 49.3711431718 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.615384615 132.220823453 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9230769231 21.7502111507 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.923076923077 0.878197800319 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 3.39072847682 206% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 53.7955601446 50.5018328374 107% => OK
Elegance: 2.14285714286 1.90840788429 112% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.549887131256 0% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.129496488143 0.142949733639 91% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0750562706 0.0787303798458 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.640172066363 0.631733273073 101% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119820942872 0.139662658121 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.266732575781 0% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.103435571967 0% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.427967056686 0.414875509568 103% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0367927948976 0.0530846634433 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.40443939384 0% => The content is off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0528353158467 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 4.33554083885 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 10.2958057395 126% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.