Trees
The article and the lecture offer two contrasting views on the effects of genetically modified trees on the environment. The author asserts that they provide numerous benefits both to the environment and human and lists three reasons to support the claim. Contrary to the passage, the professor demonstrates that even though they provide some benefits, genetically modified trees can cause significant problems and therefore, the presented explanations are skeptical.
First, the passage contends that genetically modified trees are resistant to harsh environmental situations such as pests and hence, they can survive through these conditions. The professor, however, opposes this point by explaining the fact that they are resistant to only one specific condition. She puts forth the idea that natural trees are genetically diverse and as a result, they are more resistant against various disturbances such as sudden changes in climate. While genetically modified trees are much more genetically uniform and if an unexpected condition occur, they will become disappeared.
Next, the professor refutes the idea that they have financial advantages. Although the passage points out that they produce more food or other products in a rapid rate, the professor implies that they embrace hidden costs and farmers should pay a huge amount money to afford modified trees. Moreover, she argues that farmers can't collect the new produced seeds from modified trees and then plant them for free. Indeed, they should pay the modifier company every time for planting new trees.
Finally, the text points out that the exploit of genetically modified trees may stop overuse of wild trees because the modified trees are designed to grow faster and to engender more yield. The lecturer, on the other hand, posits that they are harmful to the environment because they grow aggressively and they consume all of the required resources for growth such as sunlight or water. The professor believes that an unnecessary competition over the resources will prevent the growth of natural trees.
All in all, the article and the lecture appear to be in disagreement about the advantages of genetically modified trees.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 75 | view |
| 2024-04-16 | degew59415@eryod.com | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 90 | view |
| 2024-01-15 | saamaan | 83 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | MA KUNG TING | 80 | view |
- Are Parents best teachers? 73
- Some students prefer classes with open discussions between the professor and students and almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to support your ans 60
- Trees 80
- Working in teams 3
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?One of the best ways that parents can help their teenage children prepare for adult life is to encourage them to take a part-time job. 71
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 326, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...rees. Moreover, she argues that farmers cant collect the new produced seeds from mod...
^^^^
Line 7, column 320, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...they grow aggressively and they consume all of the required resources for growth such as s...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, hence, however, if, may, moreover, so, then, therefore, while, such as, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.4613686534 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 5.04856512141 139% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 7.30242825607 192% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 22.412803532 134% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1863.0 1373.03311258 136% => OK
No of words: 343.0 270.72406181 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43148688047 5.08290768461 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30351707066 4.04702891845 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70768739501 2.5805825403 105% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 145.348785872 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536443148688 0.540411800872 99% => OK
syllable_count: 571.5 419.366225166 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 3.25607064018 184% => OK
Article: 12.0 8.23620309051 146% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 2.5761589404 39% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 13.0662251656 115% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.7368900993 49.2860985944 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.2 110.228320801 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.8666666667 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.86666666667 7.06452816374 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 4.33554083885 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2420313559 0.272083759551 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0983224222301 0.0996497079465 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.121227804044 0.0662205650399 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144854081057 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.093838354661 0.0443174109184 212% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.3589403974 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.8541721854 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.0289183223 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.51 12.2367328918 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 63.6247240618 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 10.7273730684 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.