using electronic medical records
The reading and the lecture are both about using electronic medical records instead of using paper medical records. The author of the reading feels that there are several benefits to use electronic medical records over paper-based medical records. The lecturer challenges the claims made by the author. She is of opinion that the benefits of using electronic medical records are uncertain.
First, the author argues that using electronic medical records can reduce the cost that doctors are spending. The article mentions that by using electronic medical records doctors will save money on storage, transfer papers, faxing, and copying the records. Moreover, doctors can easily access this kind of record anytime, and from anywhere, and easy to transfer and duplicate them. This specific argument is challenged by the lecturer. She claims that there will not be saving money by using electronic medical records. Additionally, she says that doctors will still use paper-based medical records besides to use electronic medical records for emergency backup and signature for legal use.
Secondly, the writer suggests that by using electronic medical records there will be fewer errors. In the article, it is said that there will be fewer mistakes of improper handwritings, and transcriptions, and not a good organization of papers. so by using electronic medical records with a computer there will be standers font and error correcter. The lecturer, however, rebuts this by mentioning that there will not be an elimination of errors. She elaborates on this by bringing up the point that doctors will still use paper-based medical records to write notes and prescriptions and the front desk will enter everything in the system so still they need to read doctors' writing.
Finally, the author posits that using electronic medical records there will be aiding in medical research. Moreover, the article stated that doctors will be able to gather more information that is related to different patients on time than looking in thousands of patients' papers. In contrast, the lecturer's position is that electronic medical records do not help do medical research. She notes that in the united states the medical records are under strict restrictions and laws. It is difficult to reach medical records especially patients who can block their information from usage except for their treatment and even if doctors want to use patient records they need a lot of permissions.
In conclusion, the lecturer's opinion is opposing the author's opinion.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-08-20 | talelaldabous | 60 | view |
| 2021-06-28 | talelaldabous | 80 | view |
| 2021-02-28 | talelaldabous | 80 | view |
| 2021-02-18 | hind aljubori | 73 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | shatealabo1110 | 80 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 249, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...cords over paper-based medical records. The lecturer challenges the claims made by ...
^^^
Line 3, column 245, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
... and not a good organization of papers. so by using electronic medical records wit...
^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'lecturers'' or 'lecturer's'?
Suggestion: lecturers'; lecturer's
...lot of permissions. In conclusion, the lecturers opinion is opposing the authors opinion...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
..., the lecturers opinion is opposing the authors opinion.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, finally, first, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, still, except for, in conclusion, in contrast, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 5.04856512141 317% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 7.30242825607 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 12.0772626932 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 22.412803532 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 46.0 30.3222958057 152% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.01324503311 140% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2135.0 1373.03311258 155% => OK
No of words: 400.0 270.72406181 148% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3375 5.08290768461 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.04702891845 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68825105784 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.435 0.540411800872 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 665.1 419.366225166 159% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.55342163355 109% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 3.25607064018 246% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 11.0 8.23620309051 134% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.25165562914 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 1.51434878587 330% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 13.0662251656 161% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 21.2450331126 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1078790223 49.2860985944 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.666666667 110.228320801 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0476190476 21.698381199 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.42857142857 7.06452816374 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 4.45695364238 202% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.27373068433 140% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.652971710581 0.272083759551 240% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.280456741546 0.0996497079465 281% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.223100709188 0.0662205650399 337% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.409458304738 0.162205337803 252% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.231244131363 0.0443174109184 522% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.3589403974 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.8541721854 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 12.2367328918 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.25 8.42419426049 98% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 63.6247240618 146% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 10.7273730684 79% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.498013245 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.