Whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated
The listening lecture totally opposes to the reading lecture in whether wheat discovered in the Britain was wrongly dated. To begin with, the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were solid and dense. So, the wheat cannot be carried away by the water. Besides, some other wheat in the soil had been discovered that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well.
Secondly, the reading indicates that wheat might have been part of trade to Europe. Likewise, the listening implies that this explanation is not likely to be true. The distance between Europe and Britain is far. People from Britain need to travel to the north part of Europe first, then move down to toward the south. However, British's navigation skill are not good enough during that time. As a result, since their navigation skill in poor and immature, they do not have the ability to travel for such a long distance.
Lastly, the reading suggests that wheat in Britain had been planted long before it spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is also incorrect. Wheat will produce pollen as it grow. But there is no evidence indicate any information about pollen. Moreover, there is no evidence of farming either. In other words, since there is no evidence of pollen and farming place in this area as we expected, this hypothesis cannot explain this idea.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 60 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-30 | Steven Huang | 66 | view |
| 2019-01-15 | Steven Huang | 73 | view |
- Inuktitut 70
- Edmontosaur's migration hypothesis 73
- agnostids 73
- Agree or disagree: if a university want to attract good students, it just spend a lot of money on social activity for students. 70
- Agree or disagree. It is better to finish a project completely and then begin another project than to work on two or more projects at the same time. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 177, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'these wheats'?
Suggestion: this wheat; these wheats
..., the reading says that water can bring these wheat to the older layer of the sediments. Ho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 265, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... However, the listening argues that not all of the sediments are light, some of them were ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 480, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this wheat' or 'These wheats'?
Suggestion: This wheat; These wheats
... that did not move to some other layer. These wheat are light as well. Secondly, the re...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 123, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... spread by majority of British farmers. Whereas, the listening asserts that this is als...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, however, lastly, likewise, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, whereas, as a result, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.4613686534 153% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 7.30242825607 68% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 12.0772626932 66% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 30.3222958057 122% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.01324503311 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1254.0 1373.03311258 91% => OK
No of words: 260.0 270.72406181 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.82307692308 5.08290768461 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.04702891845 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.27256599751 2.5805825403 88% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 145.348785872 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55 0.540411800872 102% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 419.366225166 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 3.25607064018 92% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 1.51434878587 66% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 2.5761589404 155% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0662251656 138% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 21.2450331126 66% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.8227563336 49.2860985944 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 69.6666666667 110.228320801 63% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.4444444444 21.698381199 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.27777777778 7.06452816374 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.09492273731 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 4.19205298013 95% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 4.45695364238 135% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.27373068433 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237565791099 0.272083759551 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667241017404 0.0996497079465 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0996392026388 0.0662205650399 150% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145078724877 0.162205337803 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10669476195 0.0443174109184 241% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.5 13.3589403974 64% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.8541721854 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 5.55761589404 56% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.0289183223 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.08 12.2367328918 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.42419426049 91% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 63.6247240618 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 10.7273730684 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.498013245 72% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.2008830022 71% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted. The correct pattern:
para 1: introduction
para 2: doubt 1
para 3: doubt 2
para 4: doubt 3
Less contents wanted from the reading passages(25%), more content wanted from the lecture (75%).
Don't need a conclusion paragraph.
Read sample essays from ETS:
http://www.testbig.com/users/toeflwritingmaster
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.