The pie charts below show the share of Oscar winners by film genre for 2003 and 2008.
The pie charts illustrate the changes in the proportions of Oscar winners for seven different film genres in 2003 and 2008.
There were a number of differences among those genres and there was a similarity of the proportions between 2003 and 2008, that was Comedy.
As can be seen, the proportion of films changed for all the genres but it did not for Thriller films. Firstly, the percentage of Action and Thriller films that won Oscar changed significantly, going down from about half of the total to one-third in 2008, in contrast, Action film proportion increased from about 20% in 2003 to approximately a quarter in 2008.
The other differences were Science fiction, Romance, Documentary and Horror. All those genre films grew in 2008 but Horror films, Science fiction and Documentary rose to almost 20% in 2008. For Romance films, the proportion went up to about 15% in 2008.
To conclude, many more Action, Science fiction, Romance and Documentary films gained Oscar in 2008 than in 2003. Thriller and Horror films, however, decreased in 2008. The percentage of Comedy maintained the same level in 2003 and 2008
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Television has destroyed communication among friends and family. Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion. 90
- the bar chart compares different ratings 60
- UK telephone calls, by category, 1995-2002 80
- Popular events like the football World Cup and other international sporting occasions are essential in easing international tensions and releasing patriotic emotions in a safe way. 80
- water usage in Australia 83
but it did not for Thriller films.
but it was not for Thriller films.
flaws:
Some duplicated content:
and there was a similarity of the proportions between 2003 and 2008, that was Comedy.
The percentage of Comedy maintained the same level in 2003 and 2008
------------------
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 6.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 1 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 10 10
No. of Words: 187 200
No. of Characters: 900 1000
No. of Different Words: 89 100
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 3.698 4.0
Average Word Length: 4.813 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.615 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 58 60
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 43 50
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 26 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 21 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 18.7 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.274 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.4 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.473 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.698 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.156 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4