Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.
Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns with your own position and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should address both of the views presented above.
Building a moral society is a long and arduous task. In my view, the education that has its root more closely aligned with logical reasoning than morality leads to a better society. It can be attributed to the notion that reasoning doesn't leave anything for chance or mindless manipulation, as could be the case with teaching morality.
Logical reasoning keeps at bay any level of manipulation. Pondering over an issue would lead to results that are coherent, disinterested and has better chances of being morally right since the indepth scrutiny of it, would inadvertently lead to a sound decision. On the other hand, morality alone has the problem of precipitating into a dogmas and society filled with partisan ideologies.
By incorporating logical reasoning in the education system, students would be able to build a more robust society. Since, there will be a set of lucidly delineated models on which one can base their reasoning, it becomes easier to build a morally stable society.
If students are taught morality alone, their idea of "Why it works" becomes turbid, which is highly unwanted. The curiosity of the pupil vanishes and they are engulfed in a virtually laid out dogmatic world where they have to take few guidelines as true, no matter what. This introduces a risk of the students growing on to become narrow-minded, with constricted thinking area. Their thinking would be circumscribed to only a few points and would be afraid to analyse scenarios deeply.
On the other hand, teaching morality also has its merits. Over the years, people would've evolved both mentally as well as physically. There would've been points that are conducive to build a good society that have passed over the years generation-to-generation. These may or may not be in sync with the reasoning and could be more about the emotional preferences or inclinations of the current society, but they work somehow.
We can take an example of a small village, that has its roots based on morals. The kids here are taught a set of specific things that are only relevant to their society. The information passes down through their ancestors and it has been with them for ages. The society here also a moral rule of marrying people at the age of 15.
Now take another case of a well-developed city where kids are taught to reason everything. These kids having encountered such early marriages would question "Why?"; They will have ponder over it, and have good and bad points. They might then say, it's not a good decision to marry so early since people aren't biological mature enough to sustain a physical relation or some other points.
Overall, logical reasoning can have profound impact on building a strong moral society as compared to teaching morality alone. Though, morality alone has its merits in place, logical reasoning's benefits far outweigh the former and can be extremely beneficial in creating an intelligent and morally sound society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-14 | srujanakeerthi | 50 | view |
| 2019-12-03 | Opak Pulu | 50 | view |
| 2019-11-30 | abhbat | 50 | view |
- Pirouettes Ballet School is the clear choice for any child. Of all the dance schools in Elmtown, Pirouettes has the most intensive program, and our teachers have danced in the most prestigious ballet companies all over the world. Many of our students have 66
- Mass media and the internet have caused people’s attention spans to get shorter. However, the overall effect has been positive: while people are less able to focus on one thing, they more than make up for it with an enhanced ability to sort through lar 83
- Some people believe that teaching morality should be the foundation of education. Others believe that teaching a foundation of logical reasoning would do more to produce a moral society.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely aligns 97
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...attributed to the notion that reasoning doesnt leave anything for chance or mindless m...
^^^^^^
Line 9, column 82, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
... has its merits. Over the years, people wouldve evolved both mentally as well as physic...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 112, Rule ID: BOTH_AS_WELL_AS[1]
Message: Probable usage error. Use 'and' after 'both'.
Suggestion: and
...s, people wouldve evolved both mentally as well as physically. There wouldve been points t...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 141, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: would've
...h mentally as well as physically. There wouldve been points that are conducive to build...
^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 259, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...ors and it has been with them for ages. The society here also a moral rule of marry...
^^^
Line 13, column 179, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'pondered'.
Suggestion: pondered
...ges would question Why?; They will have ponder over it, and have good and bad points. ...
^^^^^^
Line 13, column 246, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...od and bad points. They might then say, its not a good decision to marry so early s...
^^^
Line 13, column 301, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...decision to marry so early since people arent biological mature enough to sustain a p...
^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as well as', 'in my view', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.202979515829 0.240241500013 84% => OK
Verbs: 0.167597765363 0.157235817809 107% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102420856611 0.0880659088768 116% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0707635009311 0.0497285424764 142% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0446927374302 0.0444667217837 101% => OK
Prepositions: 0.100558659218 0.12292977631 82% => OK
Participles: 0.0670391061453 0.0406280797675 165% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.8167609286 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0297951582868 0.030933414821 96% => OK
Particles: 0.00186219739292 0.0016655270985 112% => OK
Determiners: 0.0949720670391 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0335195530726 0.0249443105267 134% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.024208566108 0.0148568991511 163% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2951.0 2732.02544248 108% => OK
No of words: 489.0 452.878318584 108% => OK
Chars per words: 6.03476482618 6.0361032391 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70248278971 4.58838876751 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.355828220859 0.366273622748 97% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.274028629857 0.280924506359 98% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.19018404908 0.200843997647 95% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0981595092025 0.132149295362 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8167609286 2.79330140395 101% => OK
Unique words: 253.0 219.290929204 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.517382413088 0.48968727796 106% => OK
Word variations: 61.2335720197 55.4138127331 111% => OK
How many sentences: 26.0 20.6194690265 126% => OK
Sentence length: 18.8076923077 23.380412469 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3365641831 59.4972553346 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.5 141.124799967 80% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8076923077 23.380412469 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.384615384615 0.674092028746 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 8.0 4.94800884956 162% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 46.2105552934 51.4728631049 90% => OK
Elegance: 1.30921052632 1.64882698954 79% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.335069024772 0.391690518653 86% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0722139654703 0.123202303941 59% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0541242970551 0.077325440228 70% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.512505853839 0.547984918172 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.13708631469 0.149214159877 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107751119011 0.161403998019 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0639163375467 0.0892212321368 72% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.207447700667 0.385218514788 54% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0749258228999 0.0692045440612 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188353132297 0.275328986314 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620786447857 0.0653680567796 95% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 10.4325221239 105% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.30420353982 132% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 21.0 13.5995575221 154% => OK
---------------------
Rates: 91.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations to cover all aspects.