Teachers' salaries should be based on their students' academic performance.
In the above assertion author states that the salaries of professors and teachers should be based on the academic performance of the students. Those teachers whose students are able to score or perform well in the academics should get higher salaries compared to those whose students are not able to perform well in the academics. It is one of the most debatable concept in recent times, it depends on individual perspective of the person. I personally dissent the author's statement and would like to highlight on some of the drawbacks of the given assertion.
Here, the author has categorically generalized the statement. If we assigned the following concept of giving salaries to the teachers according to their student's academic performance, than the teachers of easier subject would tend to get more salary than the teachers of difficult subject. Supposingly, if a student find history as a easy subject while it computes maths as a difficult subject than the student is naturally going to perform well in the academics for history and will not perform so well in the academics for maths. While, the given criteria doesn't imply that history teacher is more intelligent than the maths teacher. Thus, it negates the above statement of classifying the salaries of professors according to their student's performance in the academics.
While there is a possibility that numerous of students might be attending or pursuing coaching classes for different subjects which can drastically affect the academic performance in that particular subject. This performance cannot be attributed to their respective school teacher or college professor, it is due to the coaching classes that student may perform well in the curiculum.
Here, the strenght of the student can also affect the overall academics of the particular class. Supposingly, a physics teacher elucidates 40 students out of which 20 students perform well in the academic curiculum, While a chemistry teacher elucidates 20 students out of which 12 students perform well in the academics. Though the number of students performing well in physics are more than students performing in chemistry, the percentage of students performing well in academics is better of the chemistry students. Hence you cannot justify which criteria is to be choosen.
As every coin has two sides, there are few advantages of these concept. Teachers would tend to take more interest among the weaker students as their salaries are dependent upon them. They will make sure that weaker students perform well in the academics.
However, there are very few advantages of these concept and I urge to look more on the drawbacks of the statement and try to sort out the drawbacks. I exemplified my view point by negating the given statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-09 | harshit kukreja | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | Mohit Raghuvanshi | 83 | view |
| 2019-09-18 | ajonna | 66 | view |
| 2019-09-15 | Usama148 | 50 | view |
| 2019-09-09 | wenye | 50 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'authors'' or 'author's'?
Suggestion: authors'; author's
...of the person. I personally dissent the authors statement and would like to highlight o...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 515, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tatement and would like to highlight on some of the drawbacks of the given assertion. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 185, Rule ID: COMMA_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
...to their students academic performance, than the teachers of easier subject would te...
^^^^
Line 4, column 333, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...pposingly, if a student find history as a easy subject while it computes maths as...
^
Line 4, column 533, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “While” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...orm so well in the academics for maths. While, the given criteria doesnt imply that h...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 559, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
...cs for maths. While, the given criteria doesnt imply that history teacher is more inte...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 622, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'maths'' or 'math's'?
Suggestion: maths'; math's
...ry teacher is more intelligent than the maths teacher. Thus, it negates the above sta...
^^^^^
Line 10, column 520, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...cs is better of the chemistry students. Hence you cannot justify which criteria is to...
^^^^^
Line 13, column 58, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this concept' or 'these concepts'?
Suggestion: this concept; these concepts
... two sides, there are few advantages of these concept. Teachers would tend to take more inter...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 43, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this concept' or 'these concepts'?
Suggestion: this concept; these concepts
...wever, there are very few advantages of these concept and I urge to look more on the drawback...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 68, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'looking'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'urge' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: looking
... advantages of these concept and I urge to look more on the drawbacks of the statement...
^^^^^^^
Line 16, column 97, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...and I urge to look more on the drawbacks of the statement and try to sort out the...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'thus', 'well', 'while']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230290456432 0.240241500013 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.151452282158 0.157235817809 96% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0788381742739 0.0880659088768 90% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0643153526971 0.0497285424764 129% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0352697095436 0.0444667217837 79% => OK
Prepositions: 0.143153526971 0.12292977631 116% => OK
Participles: 0.0394190871369 0.0406280797675 97% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.84356853572 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0311203319502 0.030933414821 101% => OK
Particles: 0.00207468879668 0.0016655270985 125% => OK
Determiners: 0.118257261411 0.0997080785238 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0269709543568 0.0249443105267 108% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0145228215768 0.0148568991511 98% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2788.0 2732.02544248 102% => OK
No of words: 447.0 452.878318584 99% => OK
Chars per words: 6.23713646532 6.0361032391 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.59808378696 4.58838876751 100% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.402684563758 0.366273622748 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.34451901566 0.280924506359 123% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.261744966443 0.200843997647 130% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.154362416107 0.132149295362 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84356853572 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 219.290929204 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.41163310962 0.48968727796 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 44.9383732592 55.4138127331 81% => OK
How many sentences: 20.0 20.6194690265 97% => OK
Sentence length: 22.35 23.380412469 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.3286608647 59.4972553346 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 139.4 141.124799967 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.35 23.380412469 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.55 0.674092028746 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.94800884956 121% => OK
Language errors: 12.0 5.21349557522 230% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 56.801901566 51.4728631049 110% => OK
Elegance: 1.64462809917 1.64882698954 100% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.136754568121 0.391690518653 35% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128403156795 0.123202303941 104% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0938516900417 0.077325440228 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.606550696748 0.547984918172 111% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.1634424837 0.149214159877 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0640877309179 0.161403998019 40% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0668066824629 0.0892212321368 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.377227960433 0.385218514788 98% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128013963423 0.0692045440612 185% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0947279778384 0.275328986314 34% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418160637135 0.0653680567796 64% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 5.30420353982 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.88274336283 164% => OK
Positive topic words: 10.0 7.22455752212 138% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 6.0 2.70907079646 221% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.