The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although same of these changes have been negative, the overal effect of this technology has been positive.
The subject of positive impact of Internet on mankind has been fiercely debated. It's I'd widely considered that integration of Worldwide Web to the modern society has only favorable consequences, however, others consider its effects in a detrimental way. In this essay an attempt will be made to investigate whether the influence of Worldwide Network on the contemporary environment is beneficial or destructive.
There are two sides to this debate, and I would like to focus firstly on the undisputable fact that since the Inetrnet has been introduced, the way of communication had entirely revolutionized from the one existed not so long ago. For instance, at present, there are vast numbers of e-mail and Inetrnet chat programs, such as Watsapp, Skype, Telegram or Viber, that make it possible and, moreover, more convenient to communicate with the beloved at large distances. What is more, these very tools of communication not only benefit contact with the dear ones, but global trade as well. Nonetheless, despite this considerable advantage, there is a huge problem that needs to be solved and that has arisen from the addiction to the virtual world, which sometimes substitutes real people in real world.
Taking a look at the second, equally important consequence, it is obvious that the Worldwide Network has placed all the information from all around the world at our fingertips. In earlier times, conducting research required a sizable amount of time. Currently, as it was already mentioned above, the same information can be accessed at the click of a button. Confessedly, not everything available on the Internet is neither helpful nor reliable, due to the fact that there is a huge amount of content not destined to be viewed and, on numerous occasions, can be dangerous or offensive, ranging from pornography to suspicious employers that attract youngsters and, if the worst comes to the worst, sell them into slavery.
My opinion based on an analysis of the two arguments is that inspite of all the negative impacts listed, I, personally, advocate that the idea of free flow of information and enhancement in the technology of communication has, by and large, been a meritorious achievement gained by human beings.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016-08-01 | Karmelitta | 78 | view |
- The Internet has dramatically altered our lives over the past few decades. Although same of these changes have been negative, the overal effect of this technology has been positive. 78
- The two maps below show an island, before and after the construction of some tourist facilities. Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 78
- Cycling has many benefits, yet in some countries there is a decrease in numbers of people using bicycles as their main form of transportation. Why is it happening? Give suggestions how to encourage people to use bicycles again. 78
- In some countries children have very strict rules of behavior, in other countries they are allowed to do almost anything they like. To what extent should children have to follow rules? 73
- Sports encourage competition rather than cooperation Therefore sports should not be encouraged at school To what extent do agree or disagree with the statement 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 86, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'd
... mankind has been fiercely debated. Its Id widely considered that integration of W...
^^
Line 1, column 233, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a detrimental way" with adverb for "detrimental"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s, however, others consider its effects in a detrimental way. In this essay an attempt will be made ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'look', 'moreover', 'nonetheless', 'second', 'so', 'well', 'for instance', 'such as', 'by and large', 'what is more']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.210784313725 0.247107183377 85% => OK
Verbs: 0.142156862745 0.155533422707 91% => OK
Adjectives: 0.107843137255 0.0946595960268 114% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0612745098039 0.0501214627716 122% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0245098039216 0.0437548338989 56% => OK
Prepositions: 0.134803921569 0.122226691241 110% => OK
Participles: 0.0514705882353 0.0403226058552 128% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.01530947102 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0269607843137 0.0326793684256 83% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.102941176471 0.0861772015684 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00980392156863 0.021408717616 46% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0122549019608 0.011925033212 103% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2237.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 362.0 316.048096192 115% => OK
Chars per words: 6.17955801105 6.12580529183 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20517956788 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.386740331492 0.374742101984 103% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.32044198895 0.28420135186 113% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.223756906077 0.203846283523 110% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.160220994475 0.137316102897 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01530947102 2.80594681477 107% => OK
Unique words: 223.0 176.037074148 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616022099448 0.56093040696 110% => OK
Word variations: 74.5550072301 60.7387585426 123% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0891783567 75% => OK
Sentence length: 30.1666666667 20.7743622355 145% => OK
Sentence length SD: 83.4319416584 49.517814964 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 186.416666667 127.492653851 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 30.1666666667 20.7743622355 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.25 0.814263465372 154% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.99599198397 50% => OK
Readability: 62.2108655617 49.1944974215 126% => OK
Elegance: 1.74193548387 1.69124875643 103% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.374052249046 0.332605444948 112% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0913068904744 0.102741220458 89% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0555227964163 0.0668466124924 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.587007987861 0.534860350844 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.18855794193 0.148594505496 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.180205820512 0.134430193775 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0953979241042 0.0742795772207 128% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.386454341777 0.324371583561 119% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0686811558636 0.0638462369009 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.283050209377 0.228012699653 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0362315235369 0.058150111329 62% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.68436873747 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.41683366733 59% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 2.5751503006 78% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 1.9629258517 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 6.0 10.4468937876 57% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.