A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its professors for the purpose of enhancing morale among the faculty and luring new professors.
The letter from the faculty committee to the president of Seatown University, points out that free-tution for its professors should be instituted in order to enhance the morale among the professor and also to allure new professors to join. To support the point, they have given the arguement that the Study at Oceania University showed their is a direct proptional relationship exist between the free tution offer to its professors and their retention. Though from a abstract point of view the arguement seems to be legitimate, but a close analysis faind out that the arguement is flawed owing to the absence of some very important evidences.
First of all, the arguement does not give any hint about the sample base of the study. For example what is the total number of professors participated in the study; what is their age group; how many among them has actually college going children and how many actually prefer to avail the offer of free tutionship for their children at their own university. Also it does not mention anything abot the sample university the study has covered. It might be the case that the sample space if skewed and biased.
Secondly, the arguement must evaluate if any other measures can be incorporated in order to boost the faculties morale. For example, can the professors be provided some better monetary benefits instead of free tutionship, or any other perks which can compensate for the dissatisfaction among the professor if any present.
One of the larger lacunae in the arguement is that, it does not provide any solid qunatifiable figures like what is the average increase in number of years of the professors affiliation to university; if the professors leaving the university just after completely avialing the free tuionship for all of his children.The arguement, must discuss these numbers in order to evaluate the proposition.
Lastly the argument must put forward suggestion fot the proper execution of the propostion if at all it gets implemented. It must look at the angle where this benefit can be abused by some of the professors, how that can be prevented.
Providng evidences and explanation to all of the above questions, can be really helpful to evaluate the arguement in a more holistic manner. All the evidences must be examined from all the angles so as not to miss any important case which may weaken the proposition.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-19 | DCAD123 | 65 | view |
| 2022-11-08 | ZAINBM | 33 | view |
| 2022-09-28 | Mufaddal Rangwala | 66 | view |
| 2022-06-21 | Nalu00 | 72 | view |
| 2021-12-31 | landerson1 | 58 | view |
- People who take decision on the basis of emotion and justify them with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculam untill they enter college. 50
- A study conducted at nearby Oceania University showed that faculty retention is higher when professors are offered free tuition at the university for their own college-aged children. Therefore, Seatown should institute a free-tuition policy for its profes 66
- An international development organization, in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus, has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A. While seeds for this new type of millet cost more, farmers will be p 58
- Claim: Even though young people often receive the advice to “follow your dreams,” more emphasis should be placed on picking worthy goals.Reason: Many people’s dreams are inherently selfish. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 337, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
... the Study at Oceania University showed their is a direct proptional relationship exi...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 466, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...essors and their retention. Though from a abstract point of view the arguement se...
^
Line 3, column 358, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...their children at their own university. Also it does not mention anything abot the s...
^^^^
Line 5, column 103, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'faculties'' or 'faculty's'?
Suggestion: faculties'; faculty's
...n be incorporated in order to boost the faculties morale. For example, can the professors...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 164, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'professors'' or 'professor's'?
Suggestion: professors'; professor's
...rage increase in number of years of the professors affiliation to university; if the profe...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 317, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
... free tuionship for all of his children.The arguement, must discuss these numbers i...
^^^
Line 9, column 185, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...gle where this benefit can be abused by some of the professors, how that can be prevented. ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 11, column 39, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
... Providng evidences and explanation to all of the above questions, can be really helpful ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'lastly', 'look', 'may', 'really', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'for example', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.230588235294 0.25644967241 90% => OK
Verbs: 0.148235294118 0.15541462614 95% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0729411764706 0.0836205057962 87% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0423529411765 0.0520304965353 81% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0352941176471 0.0272364105082 130% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.136470588235 0.125424944231 109% => OK
Participles: 0.04 0.0416121511921 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.80543477025 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0352941176471 0.026700313972 132% => OK
Particles: 0.00470588235294 0.001811407834 260% => OK
Determiners: 0.150588235294 0.113004496875 133% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0329411764706 0.0255425247493 129% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0211764705882 0.0127820249294 166% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2384.0 2731.13054187 87% => OK
No of words: 397.0 446.07635468 89% => OK
Chars per words: 6.00503778338 6.12365571057 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.46372701284 4.57801047555 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.340050377834 0.378187486979 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.267002518892 0.287650121315 93% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.206549118388 0.208842608468 99% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.148614609572 0.135150697306 110% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80543477025 2.79052419416 101% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 207.018472906 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508816120907 0.469332199767 108% => OK
Word variations: 55.9342772736 52.1807786196 107% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 20.039408867 70% => OK
Sentence length: 28.3571428571 23.2022227129 122% => OK
Sentence length SD: 86.7592552259 57.7814097925 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 170.285714286 141.986410481 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.3571428571 23.2022227129 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.724660767414 138% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 5.14285714286 117% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 3.58251231527 223% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 55.0573947463 51.9672348444 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.80208333333 1.8405768891 98% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241377486667 0.441005458295 55% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.17687689187 0.135418324435 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0511875955497 0.0829849096947 62% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.735470160492 0.58762219726 125% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.119361245556 0.147661913831 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117734817655 0.193483328276 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.082468683389 0.0970749176394 85% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.408706898174 0.42659136922 96% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0624072852655 0.0774707102158 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.153469827658 0.312017818177 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0727403247922 0.0698173142475 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.33743842365 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 6.87684729064 44% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.82512315271 41% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 6.46551724138 124% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 5.36822660099 56% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.82389162562 35% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 14.657635468 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.