Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim and the reason on which that claim is based.
It is undeniably true that in order to discover something that has an immediate and practical application, we need to expand our researches beyond the areas that we expect to find the outcome. However, it does not necessarily mean that we cannot predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. In some circumstances, we, however, can discover something that has an immediate and practical application by merely harnessing few areas.
First and foremost, in order to know whether we should not limit our investigations to only those areas in which we expect to find something important, we have to know how much budget that we have as well as the resources because expanding our researchers would need much more money, such as for providing equipment. Although we should not limit our research area, we should realize our capability. If we do not have sufficient budget and resources to conduct the research, then it is difficult and not prudent to focus on more areas. Our first priority is always to discover the immediate and practical application by using the most probable areas in which we find something that we want.
In addition to the sufficiency of the budget and the resource available, we should also correlate our research with the time that we have. Should we finish the research as soon as possible because we have tight schedule or is it quite long for us to carry out the research? If we do not have much time, then we should focus on the areas in which we more likely to discover something that has an immediate and practical application.
Last but not least, although it seems arduous to predict the outcome of a line of research, particularly the complex and enigmatic research involving many variables, it does not necessarily mean that we could not predict the research with any certainty. Take, for example, the researchers pursuing doctoral degree who want to run a basic chemistry research in a laboratory. In the past, there were so many scientists and lectures who ever conducted the result thoroughly and published the result in journal website or internet. Further, they have adjusted that experiment with the theory and the result was convincing and cogent. Then, the students studied that result and did the similar experiment and predicted the outcome that they believed. So, it would be possible to forecast the outcome of a line of research with any certainty in such circumstance.
To reiterate, in order to ensure that we should not limit our investigation to merely those areas in which we expect to discover something that has an immediate and practical application, we should consider several factors beforehand including the money and the resource that we have, the availability, and, of course, our time. The statement claiming that we should not limit our investigation for those areas because it is impossible to predict the result of a line of research with any certainty is fallacious since in some circumstances, we can inarguably find out the result of a research without conducting the experiment thoroughly because it has been ever done by other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | z.salahshoor | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | luciano.pisa | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | p30kh40 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | p30kh40 | 75 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | sanket007 | 66 | view |
- When old buildings stand on ground that modern planners feel could be better used for modern purposes, modern development should be given precedence over the preservation of historic buildings.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you 50
- A person should not take an important decision alone. 70
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 94
- The following is a letter to the head of the tourism bureau on the island of Tria."Erosion of beach sand along the shores of Tria Island is a serious threat to our island and our tourist industry. In order to stop the erosion, we should charge people for 66
- Dinosaurs 86
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 584, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[1]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'research'.
Suggestion: research
...e can inarguably find out the result of a research without conducting the experiment thoro...
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'well', 'as for', 'for example', 'in addition', 'of course', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.18453427065 0.240241500013 77% => OK
Verbs: 0.158172231986 0.157235817809 101% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0738137082601 0.0880659088768 84% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0755711775044 0.0497285424764 152% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0861159929701 0.0444667217837 194% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.119507908612 0.12292977631 97% => OK
Participles: 0.02460456942 0.0406280797675 61% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.85884673487 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0369068541301 0.030933414821 119% => OK
Particles: 0.00351493848858 0.0016655270985 211% => OK
Determiners: 0.0949033391916 0.0997080785238 95% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0263620386643 0.0249443105267 106% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0193321616872 0.0148568991511 130% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3130.0 2732.02544248 115% => OK
No of words: 522.0 452.878318584 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.99616858238 6.0361032391 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.77988695657 4.58838876751 104% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350574712644 0.366273622748 96% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.281609195402 0.280924506359 100% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.227969348659 0.200843997647 114% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155172413793 0.132149295362 117% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85884673487 2.79330140395 102% => OK
Unique words: 206.0 219.290929204 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.394636015326 0.48968727796 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.1718732376 55.4138127331 82% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 20.6194690265 87% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 23.380412469 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 81.3527792479 59.4972553346 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 173.888888889 141.124799967 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 23.380412469 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.777777777778 0.674092028746 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.21349557522 19% => OK
Readability: 57.1609195402 51.4728631049 111% => OK
Elegance: 1.02747252747 1.64882698954 62% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.513846248277 0.391690518653 131% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152677535136 0.123202303941 124% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0714998062967 0.077325440228 92% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.633646388833 0.547984918172 116% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.129827713051 0.149214159877 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.239186495093 0.161403998019 148% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1082759135 0.0892212321368 121% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.526004030359 0.385218514788 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0803285752452 0.0692045440612 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389308363489 0.275328986314 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0857057258961 0.0653680567796 131% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.30420353982 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.88274336283 143% => OK
Positive topic words: 6.0 7.22455752212 83% => OK
Negative topic words: 0.0 3.66592920354 0% => More negative topic words wanted.
Neutral topic words: 5.0 2.70907079646 185% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 13.5995575221 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.