tpo 26
Both author and lecturer offer two opposing views on the impact of the zebra mussel on the freshwater fish populations in the North America. While the reading passage lists some reasons as the threat for the existence of this fish population in the North America, the professor counters these specific points and presents some clues to call into the question for the information in the text.
First of all, the article mentions to the convenient transportation of mussel just by the ballast water of ships as the main reason of the unstoppable cause of invasion separation. However, the instructor casts doubt on the accuracy of this claim. As he asserts, in the past, the ships fill with the freshwater of Europe which contains high enormous mussel and empty this water at the America. On the other hand, nowadays, based on the people's awareness, the ships just fill by the ballast water from the ocean which is salty; and this water kills the mussel.
Next, the passage posits that since the mussel is a survivable species; as a result, it will be dominated in its new habitat. On the contrary, the lecturer challenges the validity of this fact. As he states, although they can be dominated in the beginning, after a while, the birds of new habitat will identify the mussel as the proper food option and alter their eating habits from previous fish to the mussel. Thus, the mussel is unlucky to be dominated in its new environment.
Finally, meanwhile, the reading part surmises that inasmuch as, the mussel is the plankton-eater fish; hence, the native fish population relies on the plankton will be declined, the professor refutes this presume. Based on his assertion, even though the mussel has the negative effect on the plankton-eater fishes, it is beneficial for the other species. For instance, it provides the relic from its eating, and this relic submerges in the bottom of the ocean, which can be considered as a sufficient food resource for the bottom-living fishes.
All in all, that is how the lecturer casts doubt on the accuracy of the claim mentioned in the article.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-05 | Apolytos | 85 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | zaid | 70 | view |
| 2021-09-04 | DarkSaitama | 60 | view |
| 2021-02-12 | Pooja dave | 80 | view |
| 2020-12-26 | marathon24h | 80 | view |
- Claim: It is no longer possible for a society to regard any living man or woman as a hero.Reason: The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree 58
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?It is important to keep your old friends than it is to make new friends. 86
- Some people believe that government funding of the arts is necessary to ensure that the arts can flourish and be available to all people. Others believe that government funding of the arts threatens the integrity of the arts. 62
- Some people believe that the purpose of education is to free the mind and the spirit. Others believe that formal education tends to restrain our minds and spirits rather than set them free.Write a response in which you discuss which view more closely alig 66
- 66 60
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 437, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
... the other hand, nowadays, based on the peoples awareness, the ships just fill by the b...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 511, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...fill by the ballast water from the ocean which is salty; and this water kills the...
^^
Discourse Markers used:
['finally', 'first', 'hence', 'however', 'if', 'so', 'thus', 'while', 'for instance', 'as a result', 'first of all', 'on the contrary', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.266331658291 0.261695866417 102% => OK
Verbs: 0.103015075377 0.158904122519 65% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0778894472362 0.0723426182421 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0226130653266 0.0435111971325 52% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0276381909548 0.0277247811725 100% => OK
Prepositions: 0.150753768844 0.128828473217 117% => OK
Participles: 0.0276381909548 0.0370669169778 75% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.64427983205 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0100502512563 0.0208969081088 48% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.190954773869 0.128158765124 149% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0125628140704 0.0158828679856 79% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0125628140704 0.0114777025283 109% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2095.0 1645.83664459 127% => OK
No of words: 355.0 271.125827815 131% => OK
Chars per words: 5.9014084507 6.08160592843 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.04852973271 107% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.335211267606 0.374372842146 90% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.253521126761 0.287516216867 88% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.2 0.187439937562 107% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.101408450704 0.113142543107 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64427983205 2.5805825403 102% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 145.348785872 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492957746479 0.539623497131 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 51.6294838725 53.8517498576 96% => OK
How many sentences: 14.0 13.0529801325 107% => OK
Sentence length: 25.3571428571 21.7502111507 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.5557337536 49.3711431718 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.642857143 132.220823453 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3571428571 21.7502111507 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.928571428571 0.878197800319 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 3.39072847682 59% => OK
Readability: 50.7092555332 50.5018328374 100% => OK
Elegance: 2.90163934426 1.90840788429 152% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.623221869994 0.549887131256 113% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.188345432169 0.142949733639 132% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0761375847004 0.0787303798458 97% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.761596256274 0.631733273073 121% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.117144925909 0.139662658121 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.363115391762 0.266732575781 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0625284095872 0.103435571967 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.569949708037 0.414875509568 137% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0651677392988 0.0530846634433 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.474681586685 0.40443939384 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0581162070947 0.0528353158467 110% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 4.33554083885 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.26048565121 141% => OK
Positive topic words: 1.0 3.49668874172 29% => More positive topic words wanted.
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 5.0 3.1766004415 157% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 30 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.