Wild animals have no use in the 21st century and trying to preserve animals now is just wastage of money.
In the last century due to the industrial revolution 30 per cent of all existing animals have become either extinct or endangered with extinction by the end of the century. Then, now in the 21st century, wild animals are no longer used in most industries which involve technology advances as a substitute to raw materials obtained from the animals; nevertheless, humanity are still experiencing nature anomalies triggered by both reduced number of wild animals and already extinct ones. Thus, it is essential to preserve and to recover wild animal species which are endangered in terms of food chain and natural disasters.
The nature is a mechanism, subsequently wild animals and plants are gears in the system, which in another word is food chain. Predators are on the top of food chain, while mammals are in the middle and insects are at the bottom. This is a cycle in which a weak becomes a prey for a strong, which should not be violated by external forces such as humans. Tigers, for instance, used to be hunted down due to their valuable skins in South Asia in 20th century, resulting in only few kinds of this predators inhabit in India and China, which in turn has triggered significantly increased number of apes, the main source of food for the predators, which have sprawled to the cities. Thus, Indian and Chinese authorities have initiated programs which aim to recover tiger species.
In addition, decreased number of wild animals has not only brought social problems but also economic ones. In China, for example, sparrows which used to inhabit in farm pitches were exterminated by the Chinese farmers in order to enhance an output of the land due to the fact that the birds consumed seeds; however, eventually, the harvest has been exterminated by insects. Thus, even small animals can be a cause of disasters magnitude of which affects economically and socially.
In the 21st century wild animals are ceased to be used as raw materials by different industries. It is now crucial that governments support financially and take care of the animals due to the fact that humans have exploited the animals intensively; otherwise, vulnerable and reduced number of animals can trigger both sicial and economical issues.
- It is important for children to learn the difference between right and wrong at an early age. Punishment is necessary to help them learn this distinction. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion? What sort of punishment should parents an 70
- All education (primary, secondary and further education) should free to all people and paid and managed by the government. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- The pie charts show the average consumption of food in the world in 2008 compared to two countries: China and India. 67
- Should a city try to preserve its old, historic building or destroy them and replace them with modern buildings? What is your viewpoint on this issue? 89
- The chart below shows the GDP growth per year for three countries between 2007 and 2010. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 624, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ms of food chain and natural disasters. The nature is a mechanism, subsequently ...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: DT_JJ_NO_NOUN[2]
Message: Probably a noun is missing in this part of the sentence.
...at the bottom. This is a cycle in which a weak becomes a prey for a strong, which shou...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 490, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...century, resulting in only few kinds of this predators inhabit in India and China, w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 330, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... of animals can trigger both sicial and economical issues.
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'however', 'if', 'nevertheless', 'so', 'still', 'then', 'thus', 'while', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in addition', 'such as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.250608272506 0.247107183377 101% => OK
Verbs: 0.158150851582 0.155533422707 102% => OK
Adjectives: 0.102189781022 0.0946595960268 108% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0681265206813 0.0501214627716 136% => OK
Pronouns: 0.00729927007299 0.0437548338989 17% => Some pronouns wanted.
Prepositions: 0.131386861314 0.122226691241 107% => OK
Participles: 0.0510948905109 0.0403226058552 127% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.71065596723 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0316301703163 0.0326793684256 97% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0900243309002 0.0861772015684 104% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00729927007299 0.021408717616 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0243309002433 0.011925033212 204% => Maybe 'Which' is overused. If other WH_determiners like 'Who, What, Whom, Whose...' are used too in sentences, then there are no issues.
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2238.0 1933.35771543 116% => OK
No of words: 373.0 316.048096192 118% => OK
Chars per words: 6.0 6.12580529183 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.39467950092 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.378016085791 0.374742101984 101% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.30563002681 0.28420135186 108% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.182305630027 0.203846283523 89% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.123324396783 0.137316102897 90% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71065596723 2.80594681477 97% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 176.037074148 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.536193029491 0.56093040696 96% => OK
Word variations: 59.1720950351 60.7387585426 97% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0891783567 81% => OK
Sentence length: 28.6923076923 20.7743622355 138% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.6350069807 49.517814964 167% => OK
Chars per sentence: 172.153846154 127.492653851 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.6923076923 20.7743622355 138% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.07692307692 0.814263465372 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38877755511 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.99599198397 100% => OK
Readability: 59.2553103733 49.1944974215 120% => OK
Elegance: 1.85416666667 1.69124875643 110% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.469229690354 0.332605444948 141% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120035052433 0.102741220458 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0923037993641 0.0668466124924 138% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.564858575214 0.534860350844 106% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.175059081084 0.148594505496 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.210698932505 0.134430193775 157% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0904821806562 0.0742795772207 122% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.469490766281 0.324371583561 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0570091097833 0.0638462369009 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.365660153944 0.228012699653 160% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0851662681817 0.058150111329 146% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.68436873747 46% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.41683366733 146% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 5.90881763527 68% => OK
Negative topic words: 4.0 2.5751503006 155% => OK
Neutral topic words: 4.0 1.9629258517 204% => OK
Total topic words: 12.0 10.4468937876 115% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.