The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment.
A sound that soothes one's mind and the sound that sounds good when one listens, that is music. There are different types of music, and each one has its own unique properties. As the topic states, the real talent of a popular musician cannot be judged until the musician has been dead.
There are two faces of a coin and so is for this topic.
A musician gain popularity through his creations. The creations that impress the audience and inspire them, like an extremely famous music composer A. R Rahman. belongs to a poor family in South India. His Music gained his fame whole over the world. but does that state all the songs he composed were popular? Perhaps, they were not. There are still a few songs which were not appreciated by the audience. The Musicians fame did not interfere in judging his music.
Music as an art is inherited by humans since birth. It is a matter of fact, that 90% of humans enjoy and understand music. It is not necessary for one to go to music classes to get hold of the "Swaras" and "Talas" (As phrased in Carnatic music for notes and pitches).
On the other hand, there are fanatics who, no matter what, praise the musician without proper assessment. Which leads to the undeserved fame. Several budding musicians spend money or give away gifts toaudience to gain fame through dishonest means. But those tricks are ephemeral.
I would like to state that, true,sincere and quality works lives long even after the death of the musician, but not a fame made through undesirable means. Famous Indian Music composers of 20th century R. D Burman and Mohammad Rafi, are still cherished by the younger generations of the country for their varied and unique style of music, they are considered as the godfather of music in India.
By which I want to conclude, the real talent of a musician never dies even after his/her death, But that does not mean that it could only be honestly assessed after the death of the musician.
- The real talent of a popular musician cannot accurately be assessed until the musician has been dead for several generations, so that his or her fame does not interfere with honest assessment. 58
- The following appears in a letter to the editor for the West Lansburg News:"The tufted groundhog lives in the coastal wetlands of West Lansburg. Ancient records suggest that the tufted groundhog once numbered in the millions. Since they were declared a wi 50
- Important truths begin as outrageous, or at least uncomfortable, attacks upon the accepted wisdom of the time 83
- some young adults require independence from their parents at an early age while some do not. what do you support and why? 70
- Men and women, because of their inherent physical differences, are not equally suited for many tasks. 58
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
A sound that soothes ones mind and the sound that sounds good whe...
^^^^
Line 4, column 162, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Belongs
...mely famous music composer A. R Rahman. belongs to a poor family in South India. His Mu...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 251, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: But
...c gained his fame whole over the world. but does that state all the songs he compos...
^^^
Line 7, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...the musician without proper assessment. Which leads to the undeserved fame. Several b...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 33, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , sincere
...al. I would like to state that, true,sincere and quality works lives long even after...
^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'honestly', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'on the other hand']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.256281407035 0.240241500013 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.140703517588 0.157235817809 89% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0778894472362 0.0880659088768 88% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0477386934673 0.0497285424764 96% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0376884422111 0.0444667217837 85% => OK
Prepositions: 0.118090452261 0.12292977631 96% => OK
Participles: 0.0276381909548 0.0406280797675 68% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.53762446241 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0201005025126 0.030933414821 65% => OK
Particles: 0.00251256281407 0.0016655270985 151% => OK
Determiners: 0.0954773869347 0.0997080785238 96% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00753768844221 0.0249443105267 30% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0175879396985 0.0148568991511 118% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1977.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 345.0 452.878318584 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73043478261 6.0361032391 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3097767484 4.58838876751 94% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.298550724638 0.366273622748 82% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.2 0.280924506359 71% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.139130434783 0.200843997647 69% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0898550724638 0.132149295362 68% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53762446241 2.79330140395 91% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 219.290929204 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.565217391304 0.48968727796 115% => OK
Word variations: 62.7262411245 55.4138127331 113% => OK
How many sentences: 22.0 20.6194690265 107% => OK
Sentence length: 15.6818181818 23.380412469 67% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6844630207 59.4972553346 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.8636363636 141.124799967 64% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.6818181818 23.380412469 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.272727272727 0.674092028746 40% => More Discourse Markers wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.94800884956 141% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.21349557522 96% => OK
Readability: 35.6818181818 51.4728631049 69% => OK
Elegance: 1.77777777778 1.64882698954 108% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.413692956573 0.391690518653 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0844112217018 0.123202303941 69% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.063874852478 0.077325440228 83% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.519687867737 0.547984918172 95% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.216384727695 0.149214159877 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126828579894 0.161403998019 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.113254500485 0.0892212321368 127% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.163192246946 0.385218514788 42% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0997404105136 0.0692045440612 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217641322868 0.275328986314 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.105699984548 0.0653680567796 162% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.4325221239 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 5.30420353982 94% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 7.22455752212 55% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 2.70907079646 111% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 13.5995575221 66% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.