Some people think that governments should spend as much money as possible on developing or buying computer technology. Other people disagree and think that this money should be spent on more basic needs. Which one of these opinions do you agree with? Use specific reasons and details to support your answer.
Rapid changes and complexity of today’s world represent new challenges and put new demands on the societies. Nowadays, we live in an era of time that recent progress in computer industry create a revolution in the world so that a plethora of people is in the conviction that governments should pay more money to improve the computer technologies. Contrary to this popular belief, there are those who argue that numerous people get stuck in their basic but essential needs; so responding to these fundamental requirements may be counted as a top priority for the governors. I am of the opinion that each of the mentioned views has their own merits and drawbacks, but there are some important issues that governments should pay attention.
First and foremost, all the countries- regardless of their level of development - encounter with some barriers. Pollution is a matter of concern for most of the countries, and they are seeking to find ways to overcome this problem. Industrialized had drawn numerous factories to pull the excessive amount of contaminated materials into the primary sources, air as well as the water. Admittedly, the adverse effect of such these pollution not only influence human’s life, but also affect the life of all the inhabitant of those regions, and it may end up with inevitable extinction of some species. Undoubtedly, if governments invest in this field, it brings a lot of positive consequences for the societies.
Another crucial fact which should be taken into consideration is that food, shelter, clean water and education are the radical rights for each individual, and a growing segment of people is still dealing with the fierce competition to acquire these absolute necessities. Thus, no one can overlook the miserable circumstance that some undeveloped countries encounter. For example, when citizens in South Africa must go miles away from their residence to get the water or a large crowd of young children has been deprived of attending in the standard classes; they cannot think about high-tech devices that may assist them to improve their life. They are hungry and, witness of dying their siblings who suffer from various diseases due to lack of hygiene. In this situation, all the life is summarized in being alive and the luxury words – such as computer technology – has lost their meaning.
On the basis of the points mentioned above I am convinced that all the countries have some common worries that is raising gradually, and they have to take efficient steps to solve these difficulties. Reducing the pollution problem, and also survive those who suffer from poverty in diverse regions of the world should be preference for the governments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 423, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this pollution' or 'these pollutions'?
Suggestion: this pollution; these pollutions
... Admittedly, the adverse effect of such these pollution not only influence human's life, b...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 322, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean ''?
... diverse regions of the world should be preference for the governments.
^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'first', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'so', 'still', 'thus', 'well', 'for example', 'such as', 'as well as']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.24693877551 0.229887763892 107% => OK
Verbs: 0.14693877551 0.158761421928 93% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0959183673469 0.0866891130778 111% => OK
Adverbs: 0.034693877551 0.046263068375 75% => OK
Pronouns: 0.034693877551 0.0685040099705 51% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128571428571 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0408163265306 0.0351676179071 116% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.86302160715 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0244897959184 0.0309702414327 79% => OK
Particles: 0.00204081632653 0.00188951952338 108% => OK
Determiners: 0.116326530612 0.0887237588012 131% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0204081632653 0.0209618222197 97% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0163265306122 0.0139019557991 117% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2710.0 2387.08602151 114% => OK
No of words: 443.0 408.028673835 109% => OK
Chars per words: 6.11738148984 5.86048508987 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58776254615 4.48200974243 102% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.358916478555 0.338922669872 106% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.288939051919 0.251872472559 115% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.225733634312 0.174417080927 129% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.155756207675 0.112833075102 138% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86302160715 2.67179642975 107% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 212.727598566 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577878103837 0.524397521467 110% => OK
Word variations: 70.712937199 59.2087087015 119% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.6684587814 77% => OK
Sentence length: 27.6875 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1290960526 48.84282405 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 169.375 120.699889404 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.6875 20.5533526081 135% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.8125 0.644075263715 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.54480286738 36% => OK
Readability: 56.5814051919 45.7405998639 124% => OK
Elegance: 1.92452830189 1.45489161554 132% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.22039299649 0.300154397459 73% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.0843013916751 0.103427244359 82% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0415299730397 0.0752933317313 55% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.549137860768 0.497263757937 110% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.133487672733 0.151897553556 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.094087573914 0.114077575197 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377375368822 0.0781384742642 48% => The sentences are too close to each other.
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.436460029902 0.336927656856 130% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0292771754586 0.067059652881 44% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.161418922011 0.210909579961 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0511574532731 0.0618886996521 83% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.86379928315 155% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 8.0 8.42114695341 95% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.75985663082 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 11.0 13.6433691756 81% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.