The city council of Smithville has instituted changes to police procedures to improve the visibility of the police force. These changes require that the town hire more police officers, budget more funds for police overtime, and direct officers to patrol significantly more often on foot rather than from their patrol cars. These improvements in visibility will significantly lower the crime rate in Smithville and make its citizens feel safer.
The argument initially might seem justified stating that the more number of police force is engaged the less would be the crime rate. The argument totally depends upon the assumptions that increase in number of police would surely decrease the crime rate. There is no proper evidence cited by the author.
Author has failed to cite any evidence or show any results where increase in number of police force has ultimately reduced the crime rates. The author revolves around a single point that it is the police number which matters the most in reducing the crime rates. The increase in budget might also bring out an economical imbalance in the society due to which the crime rates might increase instead of decreasing.
There may be increase in the crime rates if the assumption made by the author goes the other way round. For example, if police are made to patrol around the city by foot more often, they may feel lazy and may fail to go on patrol. Author has not thrown any light on how the police patrol would be scrutinized whether they perform their job effectively.
The argument would have been strong if the author would have shown the results where these practices helped in reducing the crime rates. The point would also become stronger if it would have been cited that there will be no imbalance in the economic level of the society and the source for the increase in the budget amount. Author could have increased the effectiveness of the argument if he would have shown in what way the police would be scrutinized for performing their work.
In conclusion, the argument stated by the author might prove to benefit the society as stated but the whole argument totally depends on assumptions and more light has to be thrown over the argument.
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- The city council of Smithville has instituted changes to police procedures to improve the visibility of the police force. These changes require that the town hire more police officers, budget more funds for police overtime, and direct officers to patrol s 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition. 50
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student's field of study. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 51, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had shown'?
Suggestion: had shown
...nt would have been strong if the author would have shown the results where these practices helpe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 180, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had been'?
Suggestion: had been
... point would also become stronger if it would have been cited that there will be no imbalance i...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 393, Rule ID: IF_WOULD_HAVE_VBN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'had shown'?
Suggestion: had shown
...the effectiveness of the argument if he would have shown in what way the police would be scrutin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'if', 'may', 'so', 'as to', 'for example', 'in conclusion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.245341614907 0.25644967241 96% => OK
Verbs: 0.195652173913 0.15541462614 126% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0434782608696 0.0836205057962 52% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0434782608696 0.0520304965353 84% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0217391304348 0.0272364105082 80% => OK
Prepositions: 0.127329192547 0.125424944231 102% => OK
Participles: 0.0714285714286 0.0416121511921 172% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.29761803973 2.79052419416 82% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0186335403727 0.026700313972 70% => OK
Particles: 0.00310559006211 0.001811407834 171% => OK
Determiners: 0.149068322981 0.113004496875 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.055900621118 0.0255425247493 219% => Less modal verbs wanted (like 'must , shall , will , should , would , can , could , may , and might').
WH_determiners: 0.0217391304348 0.0127820249294 170% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1755.0 2731.13054187 64% => OK
No of words: 306.0 446.07635468 69% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.73529411765 6.12365571057 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.330065359477 0.378187486979 87% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.196078431373 0.287650121315 68% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.130718954248 0.208842608468 63% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.062091503268 0.135150697306 46% => More words length more than 8 chars wanted.
Word Length SD: 2.29761803973 2.79052419416 82% => OK
Unique words: 133.0 207.018472906 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.434640522876 0.469332199767 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.1128929213 52.1807786196 81% => OK
How many sentences: 13.0 20.039408867 65% => OK
Sentence length: 23.5384615385 23.2022227129 101% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7688172019 57.7814097925 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.0 141.986410481 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5384615385 23.2022227129 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.615384615385 0.724660767414 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.14285714286 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.58251231527 84% => OK
Readability: 43.1463046757 51.9672348444 83% => OK
Elegance: 1.70238095238 1.8405768891 92% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.432068933534 0.441005458295 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.208575615967 0.135418324435 154% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.100973448998 0.0829849096947 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.729653267036 0.58762219726 124% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.144089048959 0.147661913831 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.232384780414 0.193483328276 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.066715265476 0.0970749176394 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.434542345246 0.42659136922 102% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.057428470372 0.0774707102158 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.3153398769 0.312017818177 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284093142072 0.0698173142475 41% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 6.87684729064 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.82512315271 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 3.0 6.46551724138 46% => OK
Negative topic words: 10.0 5.36822660099 186% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 2.82389162562 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 13.0 14.657635468 89% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.