TPO 42
The article states that every year millions of birds in city's environment are harmed, and provides three possible solutions for that. However the professor cast doubt on every solution by providing opposite reasons and says none of the solutions is as much effective as it is mentioned.
First, in the article it is mentioned that replacement glasses with one-way glass which is transparent in only one direction is one solution. The professor refutes this idea by saying that one-way glass will act like a mirror. When a bird see the sky or a tree in glasses, because it wouldn't understand the difference between mirror picture of the sky or tree, it would fly toward them.
Second, passage claims that painting specific pattern on glasses can improve the harming rate of birds. While the professor rejects this idea either by explaining that this painting would not help birds, for they wouldn't understand those painting as painted glasses and they would fly right through the space among stripes which they imagine as holes of painting. Painting pattern should be extremely dense with small holes so that birds consider a wall. Besides in this case building would be too dark for the people inside.
Third, while in the passage was said that artificial magnetic field could prevent birds from hitting glasses, this idea would not be effective neither, the professor says. Because birds use their ability of magnetic field recognition in traveling between long distances, when they want to go to another place with warmer weather before winter. In short distances, the professor explains, birds use their eyes to see through, and it wouldn't have much effect on birds harm rate.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 60 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2022-08-21 | mmorteza | 80 | view |
| 2021-11-14 | lutzuming | 80 | view |
| 2021-10-24 | Pariakarimi | 80 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should make it possible for children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example, for three-year-old children) at no costs for children’s families.Use reasons and 60
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Teachers should not make their social or political views known to students in the classroom. 70
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 50
- The following is a memorandum from the business manager of a television station."Over the past year, our late-night news program has devoted increased time to national news and less time to weather and local news. During this period, most of the complaint 50
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Governments should make it possible for children to attend preschool (early childhood education programs, for example, for three-year-old children) at no costs for children’s families. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 135, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ides three possible solutions for that. However the professor cast doubt on every solut...
^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 284, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...he sky or a tree in glasses, because it wouldnt understand the difference between mirro...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 213, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...painting would not help birds, for they wouldnt understand those painting as painted gl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 432, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
...s use their eyes to see through, and it wouldnt have much effect on birds harm rate.
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['besides', 'first', 'however', 'if', 'second', 'so', 'third', 'while', 'in short']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.260726072607 0.261695866417 100% => OK
Verbs: 0.158415841584 0.158904122519 100% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0693069306931 0.0723426182421 96% => OK
Adverbs: 0.03300330033 0.0435111971325 76% => OK
Pronouns: 0.039603960396 0.0277247811725 143% => OK
Prepositions: 0.171617161716 0.128828473217 133% => OK
Participles: 0.036303630363 0.0370669169778 98% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.41004241365 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00990099009901 0.0208969081088 47% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0957095709571 0.128158765124 75% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.029702970297 0.0158828679856 187% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.016501650165 0.0114777025283 144% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1681.0 1645.83664459 102% => OK
No of words: 278.0 271.125827815 103% => OK
Chars per words: 6.04676258993 6.08160592843 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 4.04852973271 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.36690647482 0.374372842146 98% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.312949640288 0.287516216867 109% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.169064748201 0.187439937562 90% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.104316546763 0.113142543107 92% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.41004241365 2.5805825403 93% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 145.348785872 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.575539568345 0.539623497131 107% => OK
Word variations: 60.0968529305 53.8517498576 112% => OK
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0529801325 92% => OK
Sentence length: 23.1666666667 21.7502111507 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.7894427333 49.3711431718 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 140.083333333 132.220823453 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 21.7502111507 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.878197800319 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 54.4616306954 50.5018328374 108% => OK
Elegance: 2.02857142857 1.90840788429 106% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.581187410866 0.549887131256 106% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.152293001313 0.142949733639 107% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0738946097669 0.0787303798458 94% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.575512317723 0.631733273073 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.115082371179 0.139662658121 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.223692601752 0.266732575781 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0572667525912 0.103435571967 55% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.248695402711 0.414875509568 60% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0284847516436 0.0530846634433 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.353609672092 0.40443939384 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050807074278 0.0528353158467 96% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 4.33554083885 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 4.0 3.49668874172 114% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 3.1766004415 63% => OK
Total topic words: 11.0 10.2958057395 107% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.