Fossil fuels are used in many countries. Other countries use alternative sources of energy, such as wind and solar power, which is encouraged. To what extent is this positive or negative development?
Nowadays many of fossil fuels are commonly used in many areas and due to such heavy usage, it damages environment heavily. To save the environment, many countries have improved the natural resources such as wind and solar power that substituted use of fossil fuels. Therefore, in my opinion, I believe that the alternative forms of energy usage are a positive development.
Majority of products that we are using daily have consisted of fossil fuels. For instance, cars, airplane, electricity plans, medicine, cosmetics, plastics and heating systems have included of use of fossil fuels. About 21.3 billion tonnes of carbon dioxide had been produced from fossil gases in the US only in the year of 2015, because of daily usages. Due to this heavily usage, it appears that it is urgent in searching for the alternative forms of energies to replace fossil gases.
Many countries have developed the alternative forms of energies to replace the usage of fossil gases. For example, in the UK and Australia have introduced the natural gases as the main form of public transportations, whereas the durable consumer goods that using natural gases have invented in the US. The market for this natural resource is increasing rapidly and it seems the usage of fossil fuels would be reduced in the future. Hence, the persistent research on natural energy usage can make the environment greener.
Even though there are still required to conduct further researches to make these natural resources to be usable in a daily lifestyle, it is definite that it does not release any harmful gases to the atmosphere. For example, wind and solar powers are limited in use due to weather conditions and this is where scientists are working in progress in this recent century. Therefore, this has brought the positive development especially in environmental perspective.
In conclusion, we are living in an environment where most of products are made and used to create the toxic emissions to the air. The result of affecting the environment is terrifying and it would be recommend using alternative forms of energies such as natural resources to make the environment healthier. We are in the progress of making the natural energies to be available in daily lifestyles which has a positive effect to environment.
- The table shows the sales figures of Fairtrade-labelled coffee and banana in five countries,namely,U.K,Switzerland,Denmark, Belgium and Sweden in the years 1999 and 2004. 73
- Some people think that we do not need to print papers newspapers anymore. Do you agree or disagree? 85
- In some countries an increasing number of people are suffering from health problems as a result of eating too much fast food. It is therefore necessary for governments to impose a higher tax on this kind of food.To what extent do you agree or disagree wit 41
- The bar chart shows the import and export of Canada (values in $) from 1991 to 1995. 56
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 54, Rule ID: MOST_SOME_OF_NNS[1]
Message: After 'most of', you should use 'the' ('most of the products') or simply say ''most products''.
Suggestion: most of the products; most products
..., we are living in an environment where most of products are made and used to create the toxic e...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['hence', 'if', 'so', 'still', 'therefore', 'whereas', 'for example', 'for instance', 'in conclusion', 'such as', 'in my opinion']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243309002433 0.247107183377 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.167883211679 0.155533422707 108% => OK
Adjectives: 0.12895377129 0.0946595960268 136% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0316301703163 0.0501214627716 63% => OK
Pronouns: 0.029197080292 0.0437548338989 67% => OK
Prepositions: 0.136253041363 0.122226691241 111% => OK
Participles: 0.0632603406326 0.0403226058552 157% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.82130812843 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.036496350365 0.0326793684256 112% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00163938923432 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0924574209246 0.0861772015684 107% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.00729927007299 0.021408717616 34% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00729927007299 0.011925033212 61% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2290.0 1933.35771543 118% => OK
No of words: 375.0 316.048096192 119% => OK
Chars per words: 6.10666666667 6.12580529183 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.40055868397 4.20517956788 105% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.389333333333 0.374742101984 104% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.301333333333 0.28420135186 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.213333333333 0.203846283523 105% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.133333333333 0.137316102897 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82130812843 2.80594681477 101% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 176.037074148 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.472 0.56093040696 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 49.694075437 60.7387585426 82% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0891783567 106% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0588235294 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.6322042433 49.517814964 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.705882353 127.492653851 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0588235294 20.7743622355 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.647058823529 0.814263465372 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38877755511 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 3.99599198397 25% => OK
Readability: 52.1921568627 49.1944974215 106% => OK
Elegance: 1.93617021277 1.69124875643 114% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325961487751 0.332605444948 98% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.17159978007 0.102741220458 167% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0999953827612 0.0668466124924 150% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.630345720392 0.534860350844 118% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.106552744989 0.148594505496 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.15425606443 0.134430193775 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0700232450815 0.0742795772207 94% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.39038357636 0.324371583561 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0721797660133 0.0638462369009 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.242295522451 0.228012699653 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0856624849354 0.058150111329 147% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.68436873747 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.41683366733 88% => OK
Positive topic words: 12.0 5.90881763527 203% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 2.5751503006 39% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 1.9629258517 102% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 10.4468937876 144% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.