The following appeared in a business magazine.
"As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded that the canned tuna did not, after all, pose a health risk. This conclusion is based on tests performed on samples of the recalled cans by chemists from Promofoods; the chemists found that of the eight food chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find small amounts of the three remaining suspected chemicals but pointed out that these occur naturally in all canned foods."
The numerous complaints regarding the dizziness and nausea have registered from the consumers of Promofoods tuna. People have requested that promofoods tuna should be return for testing. Where on the other side Promofood concluded that caned tuna did not posed health risk. The company states that test were performed on samples of the recalled cans by their own chemist and it do not pose any health risk. However conclusion relies on testing of limited number of cans for which there are no clear evidences.
To begin with, testing was performed by promofoods own chemist. And number of cans tested was only eight. Whereas request was to test eight million cans of promofoods tuna. It shows that testing was not appropriate as number of samples taken for the testing was very less.
Furthermore, chemists found that of the eight food chemicals most commonly blamed for causing symptoms of dizziness and nausea, five were not found in any of the tested cans. The chemists did find small amounts of the three remaining suspected chemicals but pointed out that these occur naturally in all canned foods. The assumption was based on their own knowledge, however, it may be harmful or it may cause the dizziness and nausea. Also chemist does not provide any evidence which states that such type of chemicals occurs naturally in the can foods. There may be some scientific reasons behind it, which is not cleared from the chemist’s assumption.
In conclusion, due lack of evidence appropriate testing of promofoods tuna is required not only by their own chemist but also by some other authorities. Also company should pause there sells and production of tuna until and unless the clear evidence that the tune does not pose any health risk like dizziness and nausea is confirmed from testing.
- Dinosaurs 3
- Agree or disagree, technology has made children less creative than they were in the past. 60
- The following appeared in a business magazine."As a result of numerous complaints of dizziness and nausea on the part of consumers of Promofoods tuna, the company requested that eight million cans of its tuna be returned for testing. Promofoods concluded 54
- Claim: Many problems of modern society cannot be solved by laws and the legal system.Reason: Laws cannot change what is in people's hearts or minds. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 168, Rule ID: SHOULD_BE_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'returned'?
Suggestion: returned
...equested that promofoods tuna should be return for testing. Where on the other side Pr...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 188, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Where” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...oods tuna should be return for testing. Where on the other side Promofood concluded t...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 256, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'did' requires the base form of the verb: 'pose'
Suggestion: pose
...ofood concluded that caned tuna did not posed health risk. The company states that te...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'does'?
Suggestion: does
...called cans by their own chemist and it do not pose any health risk. However concl...
^^
Line 1, column 408, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...ist and it do not pose any health risk. However conclusion relies on testing of limited...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 107, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whereas” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...d number of cans tested was only eight. Whereas request was to test eight million cans ...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 437, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... it may cause the dizziness and nausea. Also chemist does not provide any evidence w...
^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ist but also by some other authorities. Also company should pause there sells and pr...
^^^^
Line 7, column 159, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'companies'.
Suggestion: companies
...ut also by some other authorities. Also company should pause there sells and production...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'but', 'furthermore', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'regarding', 'so', 'whereas', 'as to', 'in conclusion', 'to begin with']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.243076923077 0.25644967241 95% => OK
Verbs: 0.193846153846 0.15541462614 125% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0676923076923 0.0836205057962 81% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0615384615385 0.0520304965353 118% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0246153846154 0.0272364105082 90% => OK
Prepositions: 0.147692307692 0.125424944231 118% => OK
Participles: 0.0676923076923 0.0416121511921 163% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.52370411771 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Infinitives: 0.00615384615385 0.026700313972 23% => Some infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.00307692307692 0.001811407834 170% => OK
Determiners: 0.08 0.113004496875 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0184615384615 0.0255425247493 72% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0123076923077 0.0127820249294 96% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1803.0 2731.13054187 66% => OK
No of words: 298.0 446.07635468 67% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 6.05033557047 6.12365571057 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.57801047555 91% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.348993288591 0.378187486979 92% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.265100671141 0.287650121315 92% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.177852348993 0.208842608468 85% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.130872483221 0.135150697306 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52370411771 2.79052419416 90% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 207.018472906 72% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.503355704698 0.469332199767 107% => OK
Word variations: 50.0761932878 52.1807786196 96% => OK
How many sentences: 16.0 20.039408867 80% => OK
Sentence length: 18.625 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.4550290446 57.7814097925 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.6875 141.986410481 79% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.625 23.2022227129 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.75 0.724660767414 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 5.14285714286 78% => OK
Language errors: 9.0 3.58251231527 251% => Correct essay format wanted or double check grammar & spelling issues after essay writing.
Readability: 45.1350671141 51.9672348444 87% => OK
Elegance: 1.63736263736 1.8405768891 89% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.562261952263 0.441005458295 127% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.128150666135 0.135418324435 95% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0710862054243 0.0829849096947 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.536781293861 0.58762219726 91% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.0998231966002 0.147661913831 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.225483722831 0.193483328276 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10383688084 0.0970749176394 107% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.292876980235 0.42659136922 69% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0498097394623 0.0774707102158 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.389567171485 0.312017818177 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0844864920607 0.0698173142475 121% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.33743842365 36% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 6.87684729064 116% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.82512315271 104% => OK
Positive topic words: 2.0 6.46551724138 31% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 5.36822660099 93% => OK
Neutral topic words: 2.0 2.82389162562 71% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 14.657635468 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
More content wanted. For issue essays, around 450 words, for argument essays, around 400 words.
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6 -- The score is based on the average performance of 20,000 argument essays. This e-grader is not smart enough to check on arguments.
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.