Your school is going to improve the teaching quality of the teachers of their high school students (ages 14-18), which of the following methods do you think is better:
1. To choose a group of excellent teachers; the teachers will attend an additional training led by one expert and then come back to the school to give other teachers this training
2. To offer all the high school teachers the additional training in effective teaching, using online material and teachers could study individually
From many pedagogical experts' point of view, although human is on the edge of the civilization now, no one can turn a blind eye to the significance of the teachers' role in proper upbringing of the children all over the world. Furthermore, there are lots of means to improve the quality of the teachers in high schools. In numerous circles of scholars and researchers, the debate surrounding whether it is better to train teachers by one expert and then the teachers come back to school to give other teachers this training or to offer all high school teachers online training, has witnessed many controversies in recent years. While both sides take their own position, it seems that the first strategy carries more weight. In what's follow, I would like to address some conspicuous aspects to cogently corroborate my standpoint.
The first compelling point to be mentioned is that some of the teachers may not visit online to receive the materials individually and so, they deprive themselves from some effective techniques which pave the way for them in conveying the particulars in the books. In other words, they may not have sufficient motivation to go on the internet and go through the materials since we are living in an age in which everyone has his or her own concerns and worries and all the time people are dealing with them to alleviate their influences on their lives. The worries including the lagging rent of the house, the bill payment, illnesses, and etc., which usually preoccupy the modern people. Therefore, due to the some concerns and mental disturbing, people may not go through the internet and in this way, their work efficiency will be declined dramatically and as a broad result, the rights of the zillion students will disparage and besmirch.
The second reason coming to my mind to substantiate and vindicate my standpoint concerned with this issue is that if teachers partake in this kind of courses, because it is a face to face learning, they can benefit from numerous advantages of this approach. Actually, when an engaging lecture is delivered, the chance is higher for them to make contributions and also drop in their ideas. If they run into problems, they can easily ask the lecturer and in this way, the chance of misleading wanes and fades away. What may come as a surprise is the proliferation of varying evidence suggesting that the learning process grow at a dazzling rate when the materials and lessons are thought face to face. Hence, this method is by far better than passive method of learning teachers.
To put everything in a nutshell, a broad look over the main points and discussions reveals the fact that for training teachers, it is better that to choose a group of excellent teachers and ne expert person teach them some essential methods and after that they come back to their schools and convey their understanding to the other teachers since in this way, we can make sure that all teachers get the materials and also, by learning eye to eye, learning efficiency increases.
- Which would you choose: a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details. 76
- Which would you choose: a higher pay job with long hours or an average pay job with normal work hours? Explain your choice, using specific reasons and details. 70
- Would you prefer to live in a traditional house or in a modern apartment building? Use specific reasons and details to support your choice. 73
- To complete his or her studies and get a job faster.To study in a major that requires many years of studying but one which would leads to better employment opportunities 70
- Universities should spend more money in buying facilities than hiring famous professors. 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'teachers'' or 'teacher's'?
Suggestion: teachers'; teacher's
... a blind eye to the significance of the teachers role in proper upbringing of the childr...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 727, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: what's
... first strategy carries more weight. In whats follow, I would like to address some co...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 52, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ompelling point to be mentioned is that some of the teachers may not visit online to receiv...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 634, Rule ID: AND_ETC[1]
Message: Use simply 'etc.'.
Suggestion: etc.
...the house, the bill payment, illnesses, and etc., which usually preoccupy the modern peo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 709, Rule ID: THE_SOME_DAY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'same'?
Suggestion: same
...he modern people. Therefore, due to the some concerns and mental disturbing, people ...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['actually', 'also', 'but', 'first', 'furthermore', 'hence', 'if', 'look', 'may', 'second', 'so', 'then', 'therefore', 'while', 'kind of', 'of course', 'in other words']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.248214285714 0.229887763892 108% => OK
Verbs: 0.142857142857 0.158761421928 90% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0696428571429 0.0866891130778 80% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0392857142857 0.046263068375 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0535714285714 0.0685040099705 78% => OK
Prepositions: 0.128571428571 0.118717715034 108% => OK
Participles: 0.0339285714286 0.0351676179071 96% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.70487308596 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0410714285714 0.0309702414327 133% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00188951952338 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.121428571429 0.0887237588012 137% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0196428571429 0.0209618222197 94% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0107142857143 0.0139019557991 77% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 3029.0 2387.08602151 127% => OK
No of words: 516.0 408.028673835 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.87015503876 5.86048508987 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.76609204519 4.48200974243 106% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.339147286822 0.338922669872 100% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.263565891473 0.251872472559 105% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.197674418605 0.174417080927 113% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.122093023256 0.112833075102 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70487308596 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 265.0 212.727598566 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.513565891473 0.524397521467 98% => OK
Word variations: 61.6165163222 59.2087087015 104% => OK
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6684587814 73% => OK
Sentence length: 34.4 20.5533526081 167% => OK
Sentence length SD: 106.417542414 48.84282405 218% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 201.933333333 120.699889404 167% => OK
Words per sentence: 34.4 20.5533526081 167% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.13333333333 0.644075263715 176% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.5376344086 88% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.54480286738 90% => OK
Readability: 60.7565891473 45.7405998639 133% => OK
Elegance: 1.74242424242 1.45489161554 120% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.503818684845 0.300154397459 168% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.120777401144 0.103427244359 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0650021616344 0.0752933317313 86% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.61008429284 0.497263757937 123% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.196547763383 0.151897553556 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24490762777 0.114077575197 215% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.115787073264 0.0781384742642 148% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.489006536524 0.336927656856 145% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0307450646122 0.067059652881 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.383264899337 0.210909579961 182% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0839190504239 0.0618886996521 136% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 11.8870967742 76% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.86379928315 129% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.91756272401 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 9.0 8.42114695341 107% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 2.4623655914 122% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.75985663082 36% => OK
Total topic words: 13.0 13.6433691756 95% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 86.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 26.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.