The chart shows student expenditure over a three-year period in the United Kingdom
The charts represent the percentage of British students spending on eight different consumer goods and services from 1996 to 1999. Students are aged under 26 in higher education.
Overall, the proportion of students’ expenditure on accommodation, food, bills and household goods, course expenditure and children decreased over three years, whereas students spent more on entertainment, essential travel and others (non-essential consumer items and credit repayments).
The student’s expenditure on accommodation and food, bills and household goods decreased over three years. Over those three years, students spent on accommodation reduced its amount from 24% to 20% whereas the amount to pay for food, bills and household goods declined from 20% to 16%. Relatively, students spent small proportion of their money on course expenditures and children of 10% and 1% respectively in 1996 and by 1999 which amount dropped to 6% and 0%.
In contrast, more students tended to spend more onto entertainment, essential travel and others. A quarter of students’ expenditure had used for entertainment in 1996 and which rose to over 30% by 1999, while other expenditure grew from 11% to 16% from 1996 to 1999. Meanwhile, students spent the relatively small proportion for essential travel of 4% in 1996 and this increased to 6% in 1999.
- The graph below shows the changes in food consumption by Chinese people between 1985 and 2010. 73
- Currently there is a trend towards the use of alternative forms of medicine. However, at best these methods are ineffective, and at worst they may be dangerous. To what extent do you agree with this statement? 67
- Many people choose to live alone What do you think the advantages of living alone are and do they outweigh the disadvantages 58
- The pie charts show the main reasons for migration to and from the UK in 2007. 67
- The graph below shows average carbon dioxide (C02) emissions per person in United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007. 73
Discourse Markers used:
['if', 'whereas', 'while', 'in contrast']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.324110671937 0.268076937826 121% => OK
Verbs: 0.0830039525692 0.116061578633 72% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0592885375494 0.0759168565197 78% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0158102766798 0.0366838410393 43% => Some adverbs wanted.
Pronouns: 0.00790513833992 0.0131127313244 60% => OK
Prepositions: 0.138339920949 0.155750635184 89% => OK
Participles: 0.0197628458498 0.0379272487307 52% => OK
Conjunctions: 3.18162065331 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0395256916996 0.0210936926555 187% => Less infinitives wanted.
Particles: 0.0 0.00175180941692 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0355731225296 0.0948980150116 37% => Some determiners wanted.
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0 0.00437022459523 0% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00790513833992 0.00967000014798 82% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1344.0 1161.00487805 116% => OK
No of words: 207.0 196.9 105% => OK
Chars per words: 6.49275362319 5.90752243213 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.79308509922 3.73763899035 101% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.371980676329 0.337110787985 110% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.289855072464 0.247514529752 117% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.256038647343 0.171178102325 150% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.183574879227 0.112407865282 163% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18162065331 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.492753623188 0.546246751206 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 42.7919207916 49.3433353143 87% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 8.93414634146 101% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.5349938568 42.9750493124 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.333333333 135.714022679 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 23.0094962315 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.444444444444 0.689975730869 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.84146341463 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.48048780488 0% => OK
Readability: 51.9855072464 47.7609492067 109% => OK
Elegance: 4.51851851852 2.94281807926 154% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164112515385 0.418131533498 39% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.212426992547 0.181151798455 117% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.181101535823 0.0850326197045 213% => Ideas in sentences are similar.
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.68939263042 0.706616315825 98% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.152096208509 0.157042692854 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987513686912 0.228904883108 43% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.060655005445 0.108899403657 56% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.391052858879 0.367819155151 106% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.128589833493 0.0812612215331 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126665699873 0.316326947829 40% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0068728276644 0.0921553760075 7% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70731707317 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.14146341463 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.08536585366 73% => OK
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.16585365854 158% => OK
Negative topic words: 1.0 0.956097560976 105% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.02926829268 99% => OK
Total topic words: 9.0 7.1512195122 126% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.