Productivity and rewards
The reading passage explains the result of positive impact on the behavior of people who are rewarded for their work. The listening passage explains why the rewards are counter productive and various impact on the people who desire to be rewarded. There are several points that listening passage focuses on that cast doubts on the points listed in reading passage.
Firstly, the listening passage tells that people feel they must be respected more than being rewarded with the money or company stock. And if their is no improvement that may lead to counter productivity and it may affect the employers. The people who were being were interviewed about their views on the productivity and rewards felt that they wanted the enterprise to be more deferential instead of providing monetary benefits.
Secondly, rewards punish the growth of people as a whole as they feel they are being manipulated and they do not get enough respect. And it is more likely that if they desired for more valuable rewards it is certain that they would be more disappointed if they don't receive it.
Thirdly, it might happen that their could be damage in the relationship and that could conceal problem in such a way that if a employer have any problem with anything he won't ask his supervisor about it as he might feel that he may lose points and won't be rewarded.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
- Sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid,we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility. 60
- Sports stars and movie stars have an obligation to behave as role models for the young people who look up to them. In return for the millions of dollars that they are paid,we should expect them to fulfill this societal responsibility. 50
- The following appeared as part of a recommendation from the financial planning office to the administration of Fern valley University In the past few years Fern Valley University has suffered from a decline in both enrollments and admissions applications 75
- Several charitable organizations in Pleasantville provide opportunities for teenagers to engage in community service. These organizations have a great need for volunteers, but in recent years, the number of teenage volunteers has significantly declined.Th 50
- The following appeared in a newletter offering advice to investors:Techcorporation is our top pick for investment this term. We urge all our clients to invest in this new company. For the first time in ten years, a company that has developed satellite tec 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: THEIR_IS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'there'?
Suggestion: there
...with the money or company stock. And if their is no improvement that may lead to coun...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 431, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...instead of providing monetary benefits. Secondly, rewards punish the growth of p...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 262, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...they would be more disappointed if they dont receive it. Thirdly, it might happen...
^^^^
Line 7, column 126, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...d conceal problem in such a way that if a employer have any problem with anything...
^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'firstly', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'third', 'thirdly']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.189300411523 0.261695866417 72% => OK
Verbs: 0.222222222222 0.158904122519 140% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0699588477366 0.0723426182421 97% => OK
Adverbs: 0.037037037037 0.0435111971325 85% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0905349794239 0.0277247811725 327% => OK
Prepositions: 0.135802469136 0.128828473217 105% => OK
Participles: 0.0617283950617 0.0370669169778 167% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.51009841776 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0123456790123 0.0208969081088 59% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.0905349794239 0.128158765124 71% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.037037037037 0.0158828679856 233% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0246913580247 0.0114777025283 215% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1350.0 1645.83664459 82% => OK
No of words: 231.0 271.125827815 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84415584416 6.08160592843 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 4.04852973271 96% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.350649350649 0.374372842146 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.251082251082 0.287516216867 87% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.151515151515 0.187439937562 81% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0909090909091 0.113142543107 80% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.51009841776 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 145.348785872 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.497835497835 0.539623497131 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 45.1332317135 53.8517498576 84% => OK
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0529801325 69% => OK
Sentence length: 25.6666666667 21.7502111507 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.1697102716 49.3711431718 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.0 132.220823453 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6666666667 21.7502111507 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.0 0.878197800319 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 3.39072847682 118% => OK
Readability: 50.7748917749 50.5018328374 101% => OK
Elegance: 1.10588235294 1.90840788429 58% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189346981923 0.549887131256 34% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.197543651993 0.142949733639 138% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.101334221013 0.0787303798458 129% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.716088127152 0.631733273073 113% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.131344382423 0.139662658121 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0987558964164 0.266732575781 37% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0845548652371 0.103435571967 82% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.31242792254 0.414875509568 75% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.104692852898 0.0530846634433 197% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123163637763 0.40443939384 30% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0646877095507 0.0528353158467 122% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 4.33554083885 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 4.45695364238 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.26048565121 0% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 5.0 3.49668874172 143% => OK
Negative topic words: 3.0 3.62251655629 83% => OK
Neutral topic words: 0.0 3.1766004415 0% => More neutral topic words wanted.
Total topic words: 8.0 10.2958057395 78% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 66.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 20.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.