Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition
Education is one of the most important tools to develop human potential in an economy. Governments throughout the world are the most important facilitators of the same. The role of government in ensuring that education is easy to avail and is serving the purpose is a pertinent one. However, governments its unwise to get the governments to bear the cost of university education of every student who has been admitted to a university but can't pay the tuition cost.
Firstly, with the cost of facilitating quality education shooting up, the provision would require the governments to increase their education budget drastically, which may not be in the favour of the economy. This would require a substantial diversion of funds from other plans. The huge capital dent may be trusted to deteriorate the overall well-being in the economy.
Secondly, the objective of getting the qualified students to attend college can be achieved by means which wouldn't require the government to drain its resources profusely. Governments create the policies of the entire nation, and alternatives like getting the banks to step in and avail softer loans (which can easily be repaid), to the students, or incentivizing High Net Worth Individuals (HNIs) to fund the university education through special schemes can do the job. The universities can itself be empowered to create endowments that can be used to fund education of the underprivileged qualified lot.
Then there comes the argument where it is not necessary for every individual in the economy to go the university. This specifically stands true for developing countries where the need for semi-skilled labour is considerably high. Facilitating education un-synched with the needs of the economy may push the country to a dangerous situation where there would be too many highly qualified workers who are not able to find jobs. A better idea in the given situation would be to avail it to individuals who would find it useful in their larger scheme of things.
Consequently, it can be said that the idea of getting the governments to fund the education of every under-priviledged student at the university level would not only drain the resources of the government, but would compromise on the other more effective policies. Instead, strengthen the primary education framework to enable every individual to garner the basic knowledge would go a long way. At the same time, mobilising the other players in the economy to take care of the education funds at the university level would do the job.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-04-10 | guozhishan | 58 | view |
| 2023-10-27 | Oladelejnrr | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-29 | nigarsafarova | 83 | view |
| 2023-08-24 | Afolakemi | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-09 | ZHOU0444 | 83 | view |
- 49. Claim: We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from those whose views contradict our own.Reason: Disagreement can cause stress and inhibit learning.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or dis 16
- People's behavior is largely determined by forces not of their own making. 50
- Governments should offer a free university education to any student who has been admitted to a university but who cannot afford the tuition 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 439, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...o has been admitted to a university but cant pay the tuition cost. Firstly, with ...
^^^^
Line 5, column 108, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: wouldn't
... college can be achieved by means which wouldnt require the government to drain its res...
^^^^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['but', 'consequently', 'first', 'firstly', 'however', 'if', 'may', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'then', 'well']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.234762979684 0.240241500013 98% => OK
Verbs: 0.164785553047 0.157235817809 105% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0902934537246 0.0880659088768 103% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0474040632054 0.0497285424764 95% => OK
Pronouns: 0.020316027088 0.0444667217837 46% => OK
Prepositions: 0.0925507900677 0.12292977631 75% => OK
Participles: 0.0428893905192 0.0406280797675 106% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.99762736114 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0519187358916 0.030933414821 168% => OK
Particles: 0.00225733634312 0.0016655270985 136% => OK
Determiners: 0.146726862302 0.0997080785238 147% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0406320541761 0.0249443105267 163% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0225733634312 0.0148568991511 152% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2544.0 2732.02544248 93% => OK
No of words: 414.0 452.878318584 91% => OK
Chars per words: 6.14492753623 6.0361032391 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51076378781 4.58838876751 98% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.345410628019 0.366273622748 94% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.297101449275 0.280924506359 106% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.222222222222 0.200843997647 111% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.188405797101 0.132149295362 143% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99762736114 2.79330140395 107% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 219.290929204 92% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.485507246377 0.48968727796 99% => OK
Word variations: 53.2093530053 55.4138127331 96% => OK
How many sentences: 17.0 20.6194690265 82% => OK
Sentence length: 24.3529411765 23.380412469 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5198507924 59.4972553346 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.647058824 141.124799967 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3529411765 23.380412469 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.705882352941 0.674092028746 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.94800884956 101% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.21349557522 38% => OK
Readability: 54.063086104 51.4728631049 105% => OK
Elegance: 1.59223300971 1.64882698954 97% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331112652422 0.391690518653 85% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.153449067023 0.123202303941 125% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.082937549467 0.077325440228 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.669811314638 0.547984918172 122% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.157720718584 0.149214159877 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.159149719697 0.161403998019 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105586208803 0.0892212321368 118% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.483286274227 0.385218514788 125% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.0397860282269 0.0692045440612 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.241055125718 0.275328986314 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0684993552834 0.0653680567796 105% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.4325221239 134% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.30420353982 38% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.88274336283 20% => More neutral sentences wanted.
Positive topic words: 13.0 7.22455752212 180% => OK
Negative topic words: 2.0 3.66592920354 55% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 13.5995575221 118% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.