Productivity and Rewards
The passage here is all about "Productivity and Rewards". It implies that if a human being is appreciated for his work then he/she tends to repeat quite frequently. For supporting that different reasons are stated. The appreciation could be in any form like rewards, extra compensation, promotion, etc. On the contrary the lecture gives the points which can be a counterfeit to the passage given.
The lecturer has some arguing points for the topic. Firstly, the lecturer talks about the mindset of the employees and how it could be in different situations. He tells that the employees might be thinking in a way that they are getting manipulated by the award schemes and that might have a negative effect to their approach to work and at the end it might reflect in their work. The most important thing for any employee could be self esteem and respect, and if they are given the respect for the work they do then it is the best way to encourage them. So this might be the first case which doubt the reward system.
Adding to that, the lecturer says that the employee might hide some flaws and difficulties he/ she might be having while working on a particular project due to the reward system. The employee might be thinking in a way that if he/she will be asking the query to his superior then that might be counted as his/her minus point. So not to risk his/her award the employee might do the work with certain mistakes and due to that the quality of the project would be less than expected. This could also be the case where reward system is doubted by the lecturer.
The third argument he stated was, if the employee is not that much intelligent and quick in work then he might not complete his/her work on the scale which is required to get the reward. That system might feel him like a punishment. Also people might not get the awards they expected for themselves which can turn into a negative point for the reward system.
These are the various points which were made by the lecturer to counter the reward system.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-04-13 | TatianaGHGH | 86 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 73 | view |
| 2022-12-04 | Hrushikesh_Vaddoriya | 3 | view |
| 2022-01-22 | mnm | 63 | view |
| 2021-06-26 | monigdc | 78 | view |
- The council of Maple County, concerned about the county's becoming overdeveloped, is debating a proposed measure that would prevent the development of existing farmland in the county. But the council is also concerned that such a restriction, by limiting 62
- Some people believe that government officials must carry out the will of the people they serve. Others believe that officials should base their decisions on their own judgment. 62
- During the past year workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on the job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries Panoply produces products very similar to those produced at our factory but its work shifts are one hour short 71
- Productivity and Rewards 80
- altruism passageSummarize the point made in the lecture making sure explaining how they oppose points made in the passage 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e a counterfeit to the passage given. The lecturer has some arguing points fo...
^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...rd system is doubted by the lecturer. The third argument he stated was, if the...
^^^
Line 7, column 234, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...ystem might feel him like a punishment. Also people might not get the awards they ex...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['also', 'first', 'firstly', 'if', 'so', 'then', 'third', 'while', 'on the contrary']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.213197969543 0.261695866417 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.177664974619 0.158904122519 112% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0532994923858 0.0723426182421 74% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0482233502538 0.0435111971325 111% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0482233502538 0.0277247811725 174% => OK
Prepositions: 0.109137055838 0.128828473217 85% => OK
Participles: 0.0532994923858 0.0370669169778 144% => OK
Conjunctions: 2.49377797319 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0304568527919 0.0208969081088 146% => OK
Particles: 0.0 0.00154638098197 0% => OK
Determiners: 0.152284263959 0.128158765124 119% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0507614213198 0.0158828679856 320% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.0177664974619 0.0114777025283 155% => OK
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 2055.0 1645.83664459 125% => OK
No of words: 363.0 271.125827815 134% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66115702479 6.08160592843 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.04852973271 108% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.278236914601 0.374372842146 74% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.212121212121 0.287516216867 74% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.132231404959 0.187439937562 71% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0661157024793 0.113142543107 58% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49377797319 2.5805825403 97% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 145.348785872 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468319559229 0.539623497131 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
Word variations: 48.6876210539 53.8517498576 90% => OK
How many sentences: 18.0 13.0529801325 138% => OK
Sentence length: 20.1666666667 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.5233376344 49.3711431718 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.166666667 132.220823453 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 21.7502111507 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.5 0.878197800319 57% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 3.39072847682 88% => OK
Readability: 41.3787878788 50.5018328374 82% => OK
Elegance: 1.37037037037 1.90840788429 72% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0904599162355 0.549887131256 16% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.144335954845 0.142949733639 101% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0839534664375 0.0787303798458 107% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.588433923886 0.631733273073 93% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.194226413798 0.139662658121 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0459948232525 0.266732575781 17% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0840006279929 0.103435571967 81% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.49723379383 0.414875509568 120% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.113735761105 0.0530846634433 214% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0606042170089 0.40443939384 15% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0550306760037 0.0528353158467 104% => OK
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 4.33554083885 231% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 4.45695364238 112% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.26048565121 70% => OK
Positive topic words: 8.0 3.49668874172 229% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.62251655629 138% => OK
Neutral topic words: 3.0 3.1766004415 94% => OK
Total topic words: 16.0 10.2958057395 155% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
Less content wanted. Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.