Scandals-whether in politics, academia, or other area-can be useful. They focus our attention on problems in ways that no speaker or reformer ever could."
The author in the above issue suggest that the Scandals are very important, as they help us for the attention in it. I am in the completely agreement with that of the author. There are many reason for my acceptance with the author view. I will try to enable it in above paragraph.
First of all, the author says that the scandals in politics, academia or other area are very important as it guide the other to not to do so. For example, as a person learns from the failure. So failure will guide to achieve the success. Furthermore, Success come from the failure and failure comes from the bad experience. Thus the Scandals should be examining very efficiently and we must take care that it won’t repeat again by us. Thus there seems no loop with that of the author.
Secondly, the examining the problem is one the important tool for the success. A life is an Experience and we should learn from the bad experience as well as of the good experience. Thus, scandals give us experience to learn from that mistake and not to repeat again. For example, Steve job, the co-founder of the Apple company. During the phase of the success, he had seen many scandals of the individual’s. He always considers the scandals as dot and he used to join all dot and used to learned from it. Thus, the scandals are very important as it leads our attention on it, so we might commit it again. Moreover, there are many individuals who find the other’s scandals as a way of distraction towards the success. As the waver only knows where its pitches the most. So we have to keep our self in that situation and think it over. Therefore, I feel that scandals are very important to lead to success.
On conclusion, to wrap my discussion over this issue. I would like to bulk all my evidence as a whole. Thus there seems no discord with that of the view of the author, as we learn from the scandals. After all life has many options, we take some while we abandon some.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-10-18 | Juhong Park | 66 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | s.sim | 50 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Technoblade | 83 | view |
| 2023-07-11 | Jonginn | 66 | view |
- Any piece of information referred to as a fact should be mistrusted, since it may be proven false in the future 50
- Nations should suspend govt. funding forthe arts when significant numbers of theircitizens are hungry and unemployed. 16
- In this age of intensive media coverage it is no longer possible for a society to regard any woman or man as a hero The reputation of anyone who is subjected to media scrutiny will eventually be diminished quot 75
- The following appeared as a letter to the editor from a Central Plaza store owner."Over the past two years, the number of shoppers in Central Plaza has been steadily decreasing while the popularity of skateboarding has increased dramatically. Many Central 50
- "Clearview should be a top choice for anyone seeking a place to retire, because it has spectacular natural beauty and a consistent climate. Another advantage is that housing costs in Clearview have fallen significantly during the past year, and taxes rema 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 186, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun reason seems to be countable; consider using: 'many reasons'.
Suggestion: many reasons
...ment with that of the author. There are many reason for my acceptance with the author view....
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 110, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'guides'?
Suggestion: guides
... or other area are very important as it guide the other to not to do so. For example,...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 324, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... failure comes from the bad experience. Thus the Scandals should be examining very e...
^^^^
Line 2, column 420, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeat'.
Suggestion: repeat
...nd we must take care that it won't repeat again by us. Thus there seems no loop with th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 440, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
... that it won't repeat again by us. Thus there seems no loop with that of the au...
^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: REPEAT_AGAIN[1]
Message: Use simply 'repeat'.
Suggestion: repeat
...e to learn from that mistake and not to repeat again. For example, Steve job, the co-founder...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 728, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...way of distraction towards the success. As the waver only knows where its pitches ...
^^
Line 4, column 103, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Thus,
...ike to bulk all my evidence as a whole. Thus there seems no discord with that of the...
^^^^
Discourse Markers used:
['first', 'furthermore', 'if', 'moreover', 'second', 'secondly', 'so', 'therefore', 'thus', 'well', 'while', 'after all', 'for example', 'i feel', 'as well as', 'first of all']
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance in Part of Speech:
Nouns: 0.194647201946 0.240241500013 81% => OK
Verbs: 0.136253041363 0.157235817809 87% => OK
Adjectives: 0.0486618004866 0.0880659088768 55% => OK
Adverbs: 0.0656934306569 0.0497285424764 132% => OK
Pronouns: 0.0802919708029 0.0444667217837 181% => Less pronouns wanted. Try not to use 'you, I, they, he...' as the subject of a sentence
Prepositions: 0.138686131387 0.12292977631 113% => OK
Participles: 0.00973236009732 0.0406280797675 24% => Some participles wanted.
Conjunctions: 2.56477672478 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Infinitives: 0.0316301703163 0.030933414821 102% => OK
Particles: 0.00243309002433 0.0016655270985 146% => OK
Determiners: 0.131386861314 0.0997080785238 132% => OK
Modal_auxiliary: 0.0170316301703 0.0249443105267 68% => OK
WH_determiners: 0.00486618004866 0.0148568991511 33% => Some subClauses wanted starting by 'Which, Who, What, Whom, Whose.....'
Vocabulary words and sentences:
No of characters: 1959.0 2732.02544248 72% => OK
No of words: 358.0 452.878318584 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47206703911 6.0361032391 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34981470047 4.58838876751 95% => OK
words length more than 5 chars: 0.251396648045 0.366273622748 69% => OK
words length more than 6 chars: 0.201117318436 0.280924506359 72% => OK
words length more than 7 chars: 0.156424581006 0.200843997647 78% => OK
words length more than 8 chars: 0.0977653631285 0.132149295362 74% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56477672478 2.79330140395 92% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 219.290929204 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.474860335196 0.48968727796 97% => OK
Word variations: 49.3153948177 55.4138127331 89% => OK
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6194690265 116% => OK
Sentence length: 14.9166666667 23.380412469 64% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9803609539 59.4972553346 57% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.625 141.124799967 58% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.9166666667 23.380412469 64% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.666666666667 0.674092028746 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.94800884956 81% => OK
Language errors: 8.0 5.21349557522 153% => OK
Readability: 35.0283985102 51.4728631049 68% => OK
Elegance: 1.21551724138 1.64882698954 74% => OK
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.114033056217 0.391690518653 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence sentence coherence: 0.118643511589 0.123202303941 96% => OK
Sentence sentence coherence SD: 0.0862939060065 0.077325440228 112% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence: 0.476145826626 0.547984918172 87% => OK
Sentence paragraph coherence SD: 0.134747868939 0.149214159877 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0462950217275 0.161403998019 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510579115416 0.0892212321368 57% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence: 0.522586666114 0.385218514788 136% => OK
Paragraph paragraph coherence SD: 0.108812453138 0.0692045440612 157% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0904831006584 0.275328986314 33% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0345000997184 0.0653680567796 53% => The ideas may be duplicated in paragraphs.
Task Achievement:
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 10.4325221239 96% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 5.30420353982 170% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.88274336283 102% => OK
Positive topic words: 9.0 7.22455752212 125% => OK
Negative topic words: 5.0 3.66592920354 136% => OK
Neutral topic words: 1.0 2.70907079646 37% => OK
Total topic words: 15.0 13.5995575221 110% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader.
Rates: 16.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: This is not the final score. The e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.