The pie chart below shows the main reasons why agricultural land becomes less productive. The table shows how these causes affected three regions of the world during the 1990s.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
According to the figures, the top core factors which cause to reducing the productivity of arable lands in three distinguished districts over a 10 years period have been demonstrated.
In one look, it could be seen that Europe have the biggest destructed area between the two other regions and the main reasons of land degradation belong to “over-grazing” and “over-cultivation”.
Regarding the pie graph, the two highest cause of lands reducing efficient in this ranking are “over-grazing” and “over-cultivation”, with 3% and 30% respectively. On the other hand, these two items have devastated the majority of worldwide regions. Due to the tables, the rate of influenced area by these factors in Europe saw the highest rise, with 13%. Oceania and North America are located at the second and third place, with 11.3% for former and 4.8% for later.
The table indicates that “Deforestation” in Europe is the integral role of degradation, with 9.8%. However, North America has the lowest percentage of tree cutting, with only 0.2%. Furthermore, the pie chart indicates deforestation is the third reason, with 2% less than over-cultivation (30%). In addition, the “Other” has a negligible ratio and does not have an enormous impact on lands.
- Many governments think that economic progress is their most important goal. Some people, however, think that other types of progress are actually important for a country.Discuss both these views and give your own opinion. 89
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology.In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
- Some people say that in all levels of education, from primary school to universities, too much time spent on learning facts and not enough on learning practical skills.Do you agree or disagree? 78
- Nowadays most of the urgent problems can only be solved through international cooperation. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 73
- Is it better for children to learn to read by using the online material or by using printed material Discuss and give your opinion 69
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, look, regarding, second, so, third, in addition, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1109.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.57286432161 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 4.39263244737 2.65546596893 165% => OK
Unique words: 126.0 106.607317073 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633165829146 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 336.6 283.868780488 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 12.0 3.36585365854 357% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.294920702 43.030603864 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.9 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.8 5.23603664747 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0896171575554 0.215688989381 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0365574244055 0.103423049105 35% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0337553590915 0.0843802449381 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0597720704768 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00882421573524 0.0819641961636 11% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.2329268293 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => It means the essay is relatively harder to read.
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 11.4140731707 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.