The table below shows the proportion of different categories of families living in poverty in Australia in 1999.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The table shows the percentage of six types of lower-class families in Australia in 1999. Overall, it is clear that the country experienced the minority proportion of all household types living in poverty. Therein, the number of aged couple living in poor conditions was the lowest, while the reverse was true for sole parents.
To begin with, sole parent accounted for the highest percentage of 21% of people who lived in the shortage of condition. The number of single, no parent who lived in poverty was lower, at 19%. On the other hand, there was only 12% of couple with children in Australia living in lack of needs.
As can be seen that Australia saw the minority percentage of people who were in household types such as couple no kids, single aged person and aged couple living in a miserable condition, at approximately 5%. However, only 11% of all household types lived in poverty on average.
- The graph below shows female unemployment rates in each country of the United Kingdom in 2013 and 2014. 90
- The two pie charts below show the online shopping sales for retail sectors in Canada in 2005 and 2010 85
- People in the community can buy cheaper products nowadays Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006 72
- The take below gives information about the underground railway systems in six cities. 61
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, so, while, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 6.8 15% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 752.0 965.302439024 78% => OK
No of words: 156.0 196.424390244 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.82051282051 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.53411884305 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59152008122 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 86.0 106.607317073 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.551282051282 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 235.8 283.868780488 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.2249924196 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.0 112.824112599 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 22.9334400587 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.23603664747 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 1.13902439024 527% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143173594873 0.215688989381 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755789573888 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0557812372668 0.0843802449381 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104097358749 0.15604864568 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376616091142 0.0819641961636 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.2329268293 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.62 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.