The graph on the right shows how prices of high-tech gadgets changed over time in Somecountry.
The line graph compares the mean figures of smart phones and exploration system in US dollars starting from July to December 2004 until July to December of 2006 in Somecountry. It can be clearly seen that although at first navigation system was costing higher than smartphones; as years went by, the prices of these two high-tech gadgets became almost identical.
In July to December 2004, navigation system cost 3,800 US dollars compared to phones which was about 3,100 US dollars. In the following half quarter of 2005, both of these devices were markedly low-priced and was having almost the same amount of 3,000 US dollars for the last six months of the year 2005.
In January to June 2006, the graph showed a rapid grow in the value of navigation system but there was a minimal fall in the price of smartphone. The only period when prices plunged in both gadgets was July to December 2006, when these two devices ended up with the amount of 2,270 US dollars.
- The graph on the right shows how prices of high-tech gadgets changed over time in Somecountry. 33
- The graph on the right describes average house prices in Sometown in 2005. 55
- The graph on the right shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the year 2001-2006. 67
- The graph on the right shows annual water usage (in millions of cubic meters) by industry in Somecountry. 73
- The graph on the right gives information on wages of Somecountry over a ten-year period. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...he last six months of the year 2005. In January to June 2006, the graph showed ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 5.60731707317 178% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 801.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 169.0 196.424390244 86% => OK
Chars per words: 4.73964497041 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.60555127546 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37591464792 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591715976331 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 233.1 283.868780488 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => OK
Sentence length: 28.0 22.4926829268 124% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.7026764182 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 133.5 112.824112599 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.1666666667 22.9334400587 123% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.33333333333 5.23603664747 45% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130362188985 0.215688989381 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0687820666079 0.103423049105 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476479018953 0.0843802449381 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0957573983219 0.15604864568 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0538338888548 0.0819641961636 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.98 61.2550243902 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.51 11.4140731707 92% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.83 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.9970731707 120% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.