The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant.
The line graph illustrates the proportion of tourists visiting the aquarium, castle, zoo, festival in Edinburgh, Scotland between 1980 and 2010.
It is clear that the least popular attraction was the zoo in 1980. While, after 30 years, the aquarium declined to the least popular. By contrast the most destination was the castle, following by the figure for tourists who prefered to travel the festival in the same period.
During the 1980s and 1990s, there was a sharp increase in visitors to the castle from 24% to 40% and then the percentage fell gradually to approximately 31% in 2010. The tre...
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-04-21 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | Giang Tran | 56 | view |
| 2019-04-21 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-23 | jAnP | 73 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the number of students who chose certain university subjects in 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 67
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to Scotland who visited four different attractions in Edinburgh Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where revelant 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 569, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...80 to 2000 and rose significantly a half between 2000 and 2010.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 848.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 173.0 206.0 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90173410405 4.54256449028 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.62669911048 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59321846053 2.54303337028 102% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 127.690721649 81% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601156069364 0.622605031667 97% => OK
syllable_count: 236.7 290.88556701 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.360824742268 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.6703201242 44.8134815571 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 76.5299724578 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.625 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.375 4.34317383033 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 7.41237113402 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111828417396 0.216113520407 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0516375586247 0.0766984524023 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0624559873167 0.0603063233224 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0995478700905 0.12726935374 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0679904814505 0.0580467560999 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 8.37731958763 149% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.14 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.