Some people think that all university students should study whatever they like. Others believe that they should only be allowed to study subjects that will be useful in the future, such as those related to science and technology.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Whether students should only study subjects that are helpful to their future careers is a debatable question. Some people contend that university students should learn a wider range of subjects, while others opine that acquiring knowledge in areas like science and technology is more important. From my point of view, I am in favour of offering students more courses relating to others fields like art and sports in college.
If students are allowed to learn whatever they want, they have more opportunities to broaden their horizons. It is absolutely possible that what students have chosen as their majors is not their true interests. If they are encouraged to delve deep into other fields, it increases their chance to discover their real interests, as they are not confined only in their own area.
However, under the fierce competition of modern society, those who master specific skills and knowledge in science and technology are prone to future career success. Our society now is a tech-driven world and many enterprises emphasise the importance of scientific research abilities when hiring staff. Therefore, having an excellent academic performance in scientific and technological relating subjects can enhance their competitiveness in the job market and also in career advancement.
In my own perspective, I contend that more artistic and sports relating courses should be opened for college students. People's happiness is not only defined by their success in professional careers, which is promoted by their abilities in science and technology fields, but also attributed to their ability to enjoy and balance their lives. Learning how to appreciate artworks and doing exercise regularly can cultivate their minds as well as keep them healthy. In this way, they can gain more happiness in life compared with those who only focus on their work. Therefore, I'm in favour of students attending more artistic and sports classes which could improve their ability to enjoy life.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-01-10 | prajwal mukkawar | 78 | view |
- The human mind will always be superior to machines because machines are only tools of human minds.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In d 50
- We can usually learn much more from people whose views we share than from people whose views contradict our own.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position 62
- TPO-10: Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? Playing computer games is a waste of time. Children should not be allowed to play them. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Society should make efforts to save endangered species only if the potential extinction of those species is the result of human activities.Write a response in which you discuss your views on the policy and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 54
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement? In twenty years there will be fewer cars in use than there are today. Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Whether” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
Whether students should only study subjects tha...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 574, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: I'm
...ho only focus on their work. Therefore, Im in favour of students attending more ar...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 24.0651302605 150% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1615.20841683 104% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34394904459 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74189580698 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573248407643 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.9537685005 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.857142857 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 7.06120827912 63% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 13.0 8.67935871743 150% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210918295607 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.079491546209 0.084324248473 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064801924695 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134455354422 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0841573813494 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.0946893788 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.0 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.