The ownership of cars should be restricted to one per family in order to reduce traffic congestion and pollution. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
This truth is a universally acknowledged fact that traffic congestion is booming day by day throughout the world. It is believed that it can be declined by imposing some strict rules on the ownership of cars on families while some others refute this point of view. These points of view will be discussed in the forthcoming paragraphs.
Nowadays, everybody wants to have his own car to go from one to another place. It leads a traffic problem up to great extent in numerous cities. However, if people start to use public transport it can be slumped within some months. For instance, In Fukuoka, Most of the families have mere one car whether they are four or five in each family. That is why there is a less traffic congestion in contrast to some other places. Also, it would be beneficial to decline air pollution which has numerous harmful consequences on health.
On the flip side, some argue that it would create problems for such people who are living in such cities where public transport is not well established. Additionally, governments have to provide wide roads with more lanes and effective public transport. To paraphrase, according to the recent survey of the British report, almost two-third cities have improper transportation system which can be developed. Thus, it is clear why some people gravitate towards this thought.
After analyzing the aforesaid points, it is has been that it can be effective to some extent indeed. Nevertheless, governments and individuals should have to take some other measures as well to reduce such problems in a foreseeable future.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-11-23 | raminhafezi@yahoo.com | 85 | view |
- One of your pen friends wants to improve their English at a language school they have never studied at a language school before and have asked for your advice on how to choose a good one write a letter to your pen friend advise them about the following th 71
- the table below shows the number of visitors to Ashdown Museum during the year before and year after it was refurbished. the charts show the result of surveys asking visitors how satisfied they were with their visit, during the same two periods. 73
- Nowadays children s writing and mathematical abilities are affected by computers and calculators Some people argue that we should limit the usage of these tools in schools Do you agree or disagree 88
- you have notices that there are some maintenance and hygienic related issues with a public park near the house you have recently moved to write a letter to your local council complaining about the condition of the park 80
- All education primary secondary and further education should be free to all people and paid for by the government Do you agree or disagree with this statement 63
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, nevertheless, so, third, thus, well, while, for instance, in contrast, in contrast to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.02651515152 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79122976722 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 159.0 176.041082164 90% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.602272727273 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 411.3 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.4102321961 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 88.4666666667 106.682146367 83% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.93333333333 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162531379651 0.244688304435 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541378194407 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362399274649 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101937653101 0.151304729494 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0568278821466 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 13.0946893788 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.6 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.61 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.78957915832 82% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.