Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways.
Like base of the pyramid is the most important part to supports all the structure above it. Similarly, I believe that some unique idea is essential part for other innovations to happen. In a nutshell, originality can defined as something derived from old ideas or it can be a creation that is never thought before. I think, single definition cannot encompass all the meanings. To advocate this viewpoint, some examples will be presented in the passage below.
In my opinion, originality also means unwrapping some mystery and coming up with unique thoughts. Let me embellish this point. We all know how satellites are revolutionizing the technological world around us. But, we cannot launch satellites without propulsion technology, which is the main part of satellite launching procedure and is not merely an amalgam of some ideas put together in some fashionable form. It is something new and innovative. Hence, I believe that coming up with new stuff also constitutes as an originality.
As an illustration, we can also see example of Facebook and other social networks. These ideas aptly fits into the definition of originality mentioned in the statement. There was existing idea which helped in development of these new websites. Hence, it is irrefutable that novel ideas are required for further development and innovation. I am not denying that new social networks are not original, they are original. But it is important to realize that initial true ideas of social networks are also part of originality.
In addition to the above mentioned examples, I believe that there are other places where humankind have come up with new things by not just putting some stuff together in a cutting edge way. These are real, path-breaking things and are not just mixture of some old ideas. I love internet and it is the most important part of everyone's life. Internet in its raw form was invented as ARPANET for military purpose, but nowadays, everyone uses a modified version ARPANET. Present state of internet is derived from old idea came up by DARPA. DARPA's idea is the base and was entirely novel and is a true original stuff.
It is apparent by now that originality can be using old ideas and coming putting them differently or coming up with new groundbreaking things. I disagree with the definition of Originality mentioned in the statement give in the question.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2019-12-02 | amruta3097 | 50 | view |
2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
2019-09-19 | nkuruppath641@gmail.com | 50 | view |
2019-07-26 | mb94 | 33 | view |
2019-02-17 | devjoshi | 57 | view |
- This past winter 200 students from Waymarsh State College traveled to the state capitol building to protest against proposed cuts in funding for various state college programs The other 12 000 Waymarsh students evidently weren t so concerned about their e 83
- The following appeared in the editorial section of a local newspaper In the first four years that Montoya has served as mayor of the city of San Perdito the population has decreased and the unemployment rate has increased Two businesses have closed for ea 75
- The purpose of art is to upset; The function of science is to reassure. 50
- The country of Sacchar can best solve its current trade deficit problem by lowering the price of sugar, its primary export. Such an action would make Sacchar better able to compete for markets with other sugar-exporting countries. The sale of Sacchar’s 50
- Originality does not mean thinking something that was never thought before; it means putting old ideas together in new ways. 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 342, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...r further development and innovation. I am not denying that new social networks are not origin...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, similarly, so, i think, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 27.0 19.5258426966 138% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 14.8657303371 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 52.0 58.6224719101 89% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1989.0 2235.4752809 89% => OK
No of words: 394.0 442.535393258 89% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04822335025 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45527027702 4.55969084622 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8918744303 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 215.323595506 91% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.497461928934 0.4932671777 101% => OK
syllable_count: 663.3 704.065955056 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 16.0 6.24550561798 256% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 4.99550561798 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 23.0359550562 65% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.6803516013 60.3974514979 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.56 118.986275619 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.76 23.4991977007 67% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.88 5.21951772744 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 15.0 4.83258426966 310% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.264694652349 0.243740707755 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0654428674626 0.0831039109588 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630614000794 0.0758088955206 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.137625975131 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0131362878616 0.0667264976115 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 14.1392134831 72% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 48.8420337079 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.71 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 100.480337079 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 11.8971910112 50% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.0 11.2143820225 71% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.