The chart below shows information about the problems people have when they go to live in other countries.
The bar chart depicts the shortcomings faced by individuals when they migrate to one place from another. The spectacular feature of the chart is problems faced by adults in learning the regional language.
At a fleeting glance, it is clearly observed that a bit less than 50% people belonged to 18-34 age group faced difficulties in doing friendships while a one-third proportion of individuals adults and almost a quarter of old aged people faced this issue. However, youngsters as well as adults encountered trouble almost equal in finding places to live whereas four-fifth populace of upper adults class had a home to live.
It is interesting to note that on an average only three out of ten youngsters experienced a complication in learning the target language. On the flip side, 35% adults messed up in communication problems.
To sum up, Although adults faced difficulties in almost every field but old aged individuals suffer only linguistic problems and youngsters worried about friendships more.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-20 | sivasankar | 78 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | Trần Hồng Khiếm | 78 | view |
| 2019-09-04 | Tiān Yí | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | nasrink | 61 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | nasrink | 67 | view |
- Financial education should be a mandatory component of the school program. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 84
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries. 11
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 11
- The table below shows the results of surveys in 2000, 2005 and 2010 about one university. 11
- The chart below shows the percentage change in the share of international students among university graduates in different Canadian provinces between 2001 and 2006. 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, third, well, whereas, while, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 852.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 162.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25925925926 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56762134501 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98602138826 2.65546596893 112% => OK
Unique words: 104.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641975308642 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3022776197 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.714285714 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1428571429 22.9334400587 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.71428571429 5.23603664747 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11845159773 0.215688989381 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0558663382177 0.103423049105 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0435289314297 0.0843802449381 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0713875408609 0.15604864568 46% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0546752349473 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 61.2550243902 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.4140731707 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.58 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.