In your opinion, who are responsible for educating children: teachers or parents?
In these days, who are responsible for educating children good behaviours remains controversial. Although some educators believe that children's manners should be trained at school, plenty of evidence suggests that parents play the more important role in children's growth.
There are a number of reasons why teachers have a good command of teaching children how to be good members of society. First, lecturers have much experience and professional methods to form children's discipline and obedience. For example, most schools offer appropriate moral lessons, which has a positive effects on students'perception. Second, when communicating in the class, children are susceptible to absorb their friends' virtues. This, therefore, can affect students' behaviours of different classes and even of the whole shool, creating a more ideal society.
On the other hand, parental education brings a lot of advantages to children's awareness. First, since adolescents are more reliant on their parents than on their school, they are more obedient to their parents' guidance. If parents took steps to equip their children with knowledge about how to be a good part of the public, youngsters would become helpful citizens in the future. In addition, since most of the young'day are spent at home, this is certainly the main place forming children's habits. Therefore, the formation of a child's manner depends on his parental education.
In conclusion, only focusing on school's education will do more harm than good. The society should also recognize the optimistic effects parents have on building the young's key virtues to become useful citizens in the future.
- There is a saying Do as the Romans do Do you think people should adapt and accept the culture of the country they visit Is is possible to learn about a culture without learning the language 87
- The maps demonstrate some changes of an island made by the building of tourist facilities. 84
- Write description of how this plastic is produced and then broken down 72
- The table shows data on four aspects of life standard in given countries. 89
- The charts give the information on the ages of population of Yemen and Italy in 2000 and projections in 2050 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, second, so, therefore, for example, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 24.0651302605 46% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1615.20841683 86% => OK
No of words: 255.0 315.596192385 81% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.45098039216 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99608801488 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8863491039 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 176.041082164 89% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611764705882 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 415.8 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 2.0 0.384769539078 520% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.9424517937 49.4020404114 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 99.2857142857 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2142857143 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283122237874 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0943200348895 0.084324248473 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.083852957269 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170837585433 0.151304729494 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0989216092359 0.056905535591 174% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.99 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 78.4519038076 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.