Nowadays, some people like to give help to the local community or provide with direct help. Other people prefer to give money to national and international organizations. Discuss both methods and give your own opinion on which is better.
At present, there are a lot of people who love doing charitable works. Some of them prefer to give help to the local community or provide people with the direct help whilst others like to give money to national and international organizations. This essay will discuss both of the methods and state my viewpoint on this issue.
Some people believe that it is more effective to give help directly to people in need. Firstly, you always know where your money goes, who receives it and for what it is being used. It makes your charity more effective. Secondly, you can check results and its effectiveness. When you know about the results of your charity works, you can find out the best way to give your help to poor people. Thirdly, when you give the direct help, you have chance to know and understand more about the poor’s lives. This helps you to give them a better help.
However, other people said that it is easier to give help through organizations. Firstly, your information is safe. Nobody knows about your identity if you do not accept. Secondly, it helps you to save time. While giving direct help usually takes a lot of time, this methods is time saving which is suitable with busy people.
In my opinion, helps should be given directly. We cannot deny the effectiveness of giving money to charity organizations. However, not all of these organizations work properly to the missions/ philosophy of donors. Some of these organizations use donation for wrong purposes. Therefore, I think it is better for people to give the help directly to the ones who really needs it.
- The state of the enviroment is now a cause for concern in all countries across the world Apart from government measures ad policies what can individuals do on a personal level to combat the negative effects that our lifestyles have on the enviroment 80
- Many people believe money is a very important consideration when choosing a job as it can help you get a better lifestyle however there are some who believe it is more important to have a job you enjoy and that this and not money will lead to greater happ 82
- Nowadays, some people like to give help to the local community or provide with direct help. Other people prefer to give money to national and international organizations. Discuss both methods and give your own opinion on which is better. 85
- Nowadays some people like to give help to the local community or provide with direct help Other people prefer to give money to national and international organizations Discuss both methods and give your own opinion on which is better 62
- Benefits Disadvantages of Facebook 59
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 263, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...irect help usually takes a lot of time, this methods is time saving which is suitabl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, however, if, really, second, secondly, so, therefore, third, thirdly, while, i think, you know, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 24.0651302605 158% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.3376753507 24% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1319.0 1615.20841683 82% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.79636363636 5.12529762239 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60222409641 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 176.041082164 84% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538181818182 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 506.74238477 82% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 5.43587174349 221% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Interrogative: 3.0 0.384769539078 780% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.2975951904 64% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2257213218 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 65.95 106.682146367 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.75 20.7667163134 66% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.51646702352 0.244688304435 211% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.154683245679 0.084324248473 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.166599168593 0.0667982634062 249% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.340168834333 0.151304729494 225% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.11963315808 0.056905535591 210% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.1 13.0946893788 62% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.74 50.2224549098 133% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 11.3001002004 64% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 12.4159519038 80% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.58950901804 85% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 78.4519038076 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.1190380762 71% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.