mobile phones
Cutting-edge technology reshapes many aspects of human life, including communication. One of these technological gadgets which have become a part of our life, are mobile phones. Although it has countless benefits, some people argue that the drawbacks of cell phones are enough not to ignore. In this essay, I will look at the issue from multiple perspectives and draw some conclusion.
First, it is undeniable that mobile phones provide the flexibility in terms of communication. Because of these advanced devices, people can stay in touch more easily, despite long distances. Particularly, many students who study abroad rely on cell phones to communicate with their family and friends. Besides communication, mobile phones can provide convenience due to its sophisticated application. For example, businessmen can do their business more efficiently with office programs on cell phones. Additionally, people listen to music, watch or download videos for which we just require internet connection. This is can be more useful for people who often get stuck in traffic jams.
As the proverb goes, “Every coin has its two sides”, utilizing of mobile phones also have some drawbacks. Along the invention of cell phones, chatting online take the place of face-to-face communication. It has been proved that, nowadays, people are more likely to feel isolated because of restrictions on online communication.
Secondly, the extend usage of these sophisticated tools can be a health hazard for people, especially young children. To spend much time with using mobile phones can be concluded with a sedentary life. Additionally, the signals which cell phones produce can be the main culprit of some diseases, such as brain cancer.
Admittedly, there are both merits to both arguments, however, I deem the advantages of mobile phones superior to the disadvantages. In order to corroborate my view I can restate, although technology can potentially be overused, it can be very beneficial if it is utilized in moderation.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Cutting-edge technology reshapes many as...
^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...erspectives and draw some conclusion. First, it is undeniable that mobile phon...
^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... who often get stuck in traffic jams. As the proverb goes, 'Every coin ha...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... restrictions on online communication. Secondly, the extend usage of these soph...
^^^
Line 4, column 14, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... on online communication. Secondly, the extend usage of these sophisticated tools can ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... some diseases, such as brain cancer. Admittedly, there are both merits to bot...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, first, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, for example, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44904458599 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12395059259 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 190.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605095541401 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 18.3861323148 49.4020404114 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 90.0526315789 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5263157895 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.36842105263 7.06120827912 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.294089258545 0.244688304435 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103109601091 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127402060943 0.0667982634062 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174203596384 0.151304729494 115% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0308494369747 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.31 50.2224549098 76% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.03 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.31 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.