Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.
What are reasons for this?
Does it have a good or bad effect on children?
Socialisation is an integral part of a holistic development of an individual as well as for society. However, in this contemporary epoch, adolescents are becoming introvert and they least bother about the others except their family members. This essay will scrutinise the causes of such behaviour and its effects on youngsters.
Over this new millennium, two prime reasons are identified as the causes of this problem. The first and foremost is the overburden of academics on pupils. As, they are always occupied with the several subjects. Also, the expectations of parents from their offspring are touching the sky which compels them to overcome and avoid social interactions. Secondly, with an advent of versatile technological gadgets, children prefer to spend their leisure time with these only. For instance, i-pod, laptop, ps4 succours the juveniles to stay busy with them and play a wide range of games.
Unfortunately, this trend has profound effects on the minors. It influences the all-round development of a teenager to a greater extent. Moreover, a plenty of personality traits become obsolete with such type of lifestyle. To epitomise, skills of communication, interaction, body posture, a way of language are highly limited among the children. Last but not least, it makes the individual prone to a plethora of diseases because of a sedentary lifestyle and lack of physical activities.
Hammering the last nail of this topic, such lifestyle deteriorating the lives of youngsters and creates numerous obstacles in their foreseeable future. Parents should take stern measures to tackle this trouble by understanding the origins and eliminating the evils in the path of juveniles growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-01-30 | Stephanie Kaushal | 84 | view |
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country. 95
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems.To what extent do you agree or disagree with the above statement? 73
- The pie chart and table below give information on tourist arrivals in Nepal in March 2008. 78
- The graphs show enrolment in different colleges in the Higher Colleges of Technology in 1999. 56
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990. 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 178, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'they the least'.
Suggestion: they the least
... adolescents are becoming introvert and they least bother about the others except their fa...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 117, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...this problem. The first and foremost is the overburden of academics on pupils. As, they are al...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... the overburden of academics on pupils. As, they are always occupied with the seve...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, as for, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.42105263158 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04749744184 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.642857142857 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.5059518187 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.125 106.682146367 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.625 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.3125 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.290749716908 0.244688304435 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0737241818763 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0545685650125 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152100155318 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0552721967891 0.056905535591 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.0946893788 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.86 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.