Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results, while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
According to Albert Einstein, The measure of intelligence is the ability to change. It is a controversial topic that whether high-achievers should be praised or individuals who depicted a remarkable trend in their performance. This essay will scrutinize both virtues and will give my own opine.
At the outset of this competitive millennium, a few people assert that pupils who scored A+ in their examinations should be rewarded and even it is understandable that they put all their efforts to excel in the academics. Also, toppers devote all their precious time and golden moments in the books so that they can achieve the avant grades out of the, say, 40-50 learners in the class. Additionally, this attitude will motivate the other students to become more profound in their education.
On the flip side, some gifted students take an advantage of this criteria and leaves behind all the diligent scholars. To judge the pupils by academics outcomes is merely not sufficient to check their intelligence as well as learning power. One should encourage the industrious habits of an individual so that he can mount up his confidence. This can be illustrated with an example of a student who is extremely good at playing musical instruments while weak in mathematics. But with a passage of time, she has upgraded herself in the concerned subject and become one of the high scorers.
Mulling over the topic, albeit mentees who scored ameliorate should be rewarded but School authorities, as well as parents, should also divert their consideration on the students who are working tirelessly to upgrade themselves. I utterly believe that both types of students should be given prizes so that they cannot lower their dignity and confidence.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | Farwah | 61 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Bui Quang | 78 | view |
| 2019-10-08 | Phạm Phú Trường | 89 | view |
| 2019-08-03 | hammy | 78 | view |
| 2019-07-31 | letrandaohoa | 61 | view |
- The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010. 89
- As water is a valuable resource, governments all over the world should control how much water their citizens use.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? 61
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of time since digital technology is now replacing their function. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 61
- To learn effectively, children need to eat a healthy meal at school. How true is this statement? Whose responsibility is it to provide food for school children? 67
- Nowadays, children play less with others and this has an impact on their development.What are reasons for this?Does it have a good or bad effect on children? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: THE_PUNCT[1]
Message: Did you forget something after 'the'?
...hey can achieve the avant grades out of the, say, 40-50 learners in the class. Addit...
^^^^
Line 5, column 61, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...me gifted students take an advantage of this criteria and leaves behind all the dili...
^^^^
Line 5, column 235, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to power'
Suggestion: to power
... their intelligence as well as learning power. One should encourage the industrious h...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1458.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 284.0 315.596192385 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1338028169 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91886754419 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 176.041082164 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.609154929577 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 454.5 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9405326959 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.153846154 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.23076923077 7.06120827912 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.213963135925 0.244688304435 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0696607374116 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579472787735 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13089019539 0.151304729494 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530702680122 0.056905535591 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.