Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and supporting your position, be sure to address the most compelling reasons and/or examples that could be used to challenge your position.
Many people think that the educational institution might have a significant impact to pursuing the career once each student, others can oppose the issue. The issue is a controversial one, but a closer examination reveals that more responsibility educational institutions to find a keen interest in a student life. A student can do their interest by the help of institution. A student might be a good civil engineer and also be a good programmer it does not mean that the student is not successful in their present life. There is the vast definition of success around the whole world, but there are no activities are present which impede their life.
In this 21st-century education system is more embellish than previous. Anyone can found short of information with few second unlike the have an interest in it. It depends on how student utilizes their interest by using their all activity in every situation on each second. Education can develop the fundamental knowledge from grade 1 to grade 10. During this tenure, students can engage verity of work which education may persuade easily. For instance, they can join any short of debate program, inter cricket, baseball, basketball, etc. activities. Furthermore, this active student may find their interest field whether they were chosen or not. Clearly, this activities education never dissuades from their pinnacle of success.
Moreover, if a student who are real math but not in physics, he/she might not face any difficulties from the institution. In additionally, this kind of student can utilize their idea in a physics lab, session. The institution can play a strong role by doing this student such they can encourage them to join math Olympiads, inter-high school competition and so on. For example, people like Martín Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi can never have been deterring from the intuition to influence the nation that such somewhat healthy political environment. They are the pioneer in such this field nowadays.
In recent decade rivalry is increasing in such purchase ticket to admission in the renowned university. A student can calculate from simple math to advance mechanics problem. If education can deter the student’s success, a player like Messi, Ronaldo can never be a gifted this type of optimistic century. More player nowadays is influenced by their style. The meaning of success may be very vast. No matter how to learn a question of knowledge came from. A baby after the born can never be fixed that the future. He/she what will be that what he has. For this purpose, education can help a lot. The institution can elicit anyone interest by observing with just peruse. People may have a different view in this respect. However, Institution can play a vital role. For example, if anyone can like very much to play Chess that does mean this student can only have this or not to force by other. If the intuition can have obliged to this student become a physicist, he/she might have lost both.
In summary, some thought that the institution dissuades one success, it is clear that there are a lot of sides that educational institution impact once career not detrimental to their life. Closer examination found that there no opaque that institutions to find a keen interest in a student life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | jenniferjack07 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | lanhhoang | 83 | view |
| 2020-01-23 | lanhhoang | 16 | view |
| 2020-01-22 | AkkineniAnuhya4 | 50 | view |
| 2020-01-20 | maneesha ch | 50 | view |
- Educational institutions have a responsibility to dissuade students from pursuing fields of study in which they are unlikely to succeed.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the claim. In developing and suppo 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoni 83
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 661, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'activities'' or 'activity's'?
Suggestion: activities'; activity's
... they were chosen or not. Clearly, this activities education never dissuades from their pi...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 430, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[7]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'have' and 'been'.
Suggestion: have never been
... Martín Luther King, Mahatma Gandhi can never have been deterring from the intuition to influen...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 635, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'interests'.
Suggestion: interests
... lot. The institution can elicit anyone interest by observing with just peruse. People m...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 29.0 12.4196629213 234% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 15.0 11.3162921348 133% => OK
Pronoun: 51.0 33.0505617978 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 27.0 12.9106741573 209% => Less nominalization wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2744.0 2235.4752809 123% => OK
No of words: 544.0 442.535393258 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04411764706 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.82947280553 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75398568907 2.79657885939 98% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.479779411765 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 867.6 704.065955056 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 6.24550561798 160% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 9.0 4.99550561798 180% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 1.77640449438 113% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 34.0 20.2370786517 168% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.8825181755 60.3974514979 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.7058823529 118.986275619 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.61764705882 5.21951772744 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 22.0 10.2758426966 214% => Less positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 5.13820224719 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 4.83258426966 166% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.168933357909 0.243740707755 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0483036718517 0.0831039109588 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.033423927703 0.0758088955206 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109926530436 0.150359130593 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0334965492362 0.0667264976115 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.3 14.1392134831 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.1639044944 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.38706741573 100% => OK
difficult_words: 136.0 100.480337079 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.8971910112 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.