The chart shows the number of mobile phones and landlines per 100 people in selected countries.
The supplied bar graph outlines the proportion of individuals using mobile phones and landlines in 6 countries of an American and European continent. The spectacular feature of the chart is extensive use of cell phones in Italy.
As is observed from the illustration, one-third natives of Canada uses mobiles as a mode of communication while approximately two-third prefer to communicate through a subscriber line. It is interesting to note that in UK, Sweden, and Italy a huge proportion of populace are mobile phone users.
Moving further, in Germany, there is a 10% difference in the usage of mobiles and landline whereas the former is ahead. Among the United States and Denmark, mankind is highest in terms of landline usage with a difference of almost 20 and 7 people per 100. The lowest number of handset users can be found in Canada while of landline in Italy.
All in all, the mobile phones are least famous in American countries. However, it renowned in European countries.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-15 | Sandhu param | 61 | view |
| 2019-11-04 | sou@M | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-09 | ravitejacts | 78 | view |
| 2019-04-30 | mohsenmortazavi | 11 | view |
| 2019-04-26 | vinusharma27 | 56 | view |
- The table below shows the cinema viewing figures for films by country, in millions. 11
- The graph shows the percentage of male and female academic staff members across the faculties of major university in 2012. 61
- The table below gives information about Favorite Pastimes in different countries. 11
- The table below shows the results of a survey to find out what members of a city sports club think about the club’s activities, facilities and opening hours. 61
- Most people are not interested in how their food has been produced They only care about how much it costs How true is this statement What influences people when they buy food 39
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, third, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 33.7804878049 86% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 828.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 164.0 196.424390244 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.0487804878 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.57858190836 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90699580808 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.609756097561 0.547539520022 111% => OK
syllable_count: 274.5 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.114634146341 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 22.4926829268 80% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 41.4767523759 43.030603864 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.0 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2222222222 22.9334400587 79% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.77777777778 5.23603664747 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.327916769934 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113594601407 0.103423049105 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420378790088 0.0843802449381 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164990613264 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0515915935564 0.0819641961636 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 61.2550243902 73% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.01 11.4140731707 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.44 8.06136585366 117% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.9970731707 84% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.