It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, the tertiary education is more and more significant with each country. It not only can train young people specialized knowledge, but it also is environment where students have many opportunities to develop their soft skill and create relationships. Therefore, I believe that it is necessary for government to build more university places to help for the development of young generation in condition permitting.
Firstly, we cannot deny the inflate appearance of university places in recent years. Some people can think that it is alarming signal of the saturation in university education. However, in my opinion, universities are built to serve for learning demands of the most of young people. A constant example, only in the Vietnam country, percentage of the school-age population is thirty percent and ninety percent in them have the desire to continue learning. Because they believe in that cannot work in real life when they only have the basic knowledge in high school.
Secondly, the permitting of countries lead on the development of many low quality universities. As a result, it not only cannot guarantee for knowledge of students but they also consume the national resources. Notwithstanding, when we deliberately research those universities, we can easily realize that the competition between them is very high. In consequent, they will automatically be removed if they do not have education quality assurance. I think that he young people always have the best choice for themselves.
In conclusion, although the university education always has disadvantage aspects, we can affirm that the university environments should be extended by each country.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 84 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | Khue | 89 | view |
| 2019-10-27 | Thao Phan Phuong | 73 | view |
| 2019-07-25 | Nguyễn Thị Ngọc Dung | 56 | view |
| 2019-07-12 | UYVO | 84 | view |
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Advertisements are becoming more and more common in everyday life. Is it a positive or negative development. 56
- It is believed that people who read for pleasure have developed a better imagination and better language skills than those who prefer to watch TV Do you agree or disagree 84
- Maintaining public libraries is a waste of money since computer technology is now replacing their functions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 79
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 25, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...on permitting. Firstly, we cannot deny the inflate appearance of university places in rece...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 455, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Because” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...m have the desire to continue learning. Because they believe in that cannot work in rea...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s should be extended by each country.
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, second, secondly, so, therefore, i think, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1421.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44444444444 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12997508441 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 176.041082164 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.578544061303 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 455.4 506.74238477 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.384769539078 260% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9258690161 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6428571429 20.7667163134 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.78571428571 7.06120827912 124% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178842030312 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0636665424408 0.084324248473 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0631007742638 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105150639295 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0307386221148 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 78.4519038076 97% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.