Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country. What are the reasons? Solutions to change negative attitudes.
It is widely argued that foreign tourism has an adverse impact on host countries. There is a variety of reasons behind this opinion, and several solutions ought to be applied to change these oppositional attitudes.
There are two important reasons why local residents often consider international tourism as a cause of serious problems in their country. One reason in that it may have a bad impact on traditional customs and indigenous practices because tourists may be not sensitive toward to local resident’s feeling. For example, Western tourists visiting to developing countries as Vietnam or Thailand may be rowdy or wear unsuitable clothing, which might have an undesirable influence on young local people who copy immodest or procovative behavior and fashions. Another reason is that tourists often pollute or litter beautiful spots and destroy famous preservation area. These situations cause the aggressive to local residents who live around these areas where day by day they see rubbishes throw everywhere, and the preservations are collapsing.
Therefore, measures must be taken by government, tourism agencies, and foreign tourists to change these negative attitudes toward tourists. Firstly, government and travel companies should inform to tourist the concerns of local residents to them avoid these misunderstanding behaviors. Secondly, tourist agencies must enforce strict regulations on the tourism industry, ensure that local operators are responsible for clearing litter and disposal of waste in right ways that do not harm the environment.
In conclusion, only by addressing the concerns of local people will negative attitudes to international tourism be changed.
- Team activities and sole activities performed by people are giving them important skills for life. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give your own opinion and relevant examples 67
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education? Or is it the responsibilities of governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves? 67
- Today, more people are traveling than ever before. Why is this the case? What are the benefits of travelling for the traveler? 61
- In the developed world, average life expectancy is increasing. What problems will this cause for individuals and society? Suggest some measures that could be taken to reduce the impact of ageing populations 67
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 81
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 41.998997996 69% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1442.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 253.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69960474308 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02565491028 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.624505928854 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.384769539078 0% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.449817936 49.4020404114 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.090909091 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.63636363636 7.06120827912 108% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202472250608 0.244688304435 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782694690552 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0634312850708 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130082382963 0.151304729494 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.03055081766 0.056905535591 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 13.0946893788 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.08 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.27 8.58950901804 120% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.