The table below shows the income and expenditure of Harckley Hall, a public place for hiring over the period of three years.
The table compares data about annual income and expenditure of Harckley Hall during 3 years period.
Overall, while income from hiring room and tax declined, that from coffee saw a sharp rise over the period. Meanwhile, subsidies and profit tent to reduce.
In the first year, tax income was considerably higher than other sources, where 75.000 Euros were generated, while only 3000 Euros was brought from coffee. After a year, money from hiring room, coffee, and tax appeared to increase by 1000 Euros in the first two items and 3000 Euros with the last one. In contrast, funding from local council remained unchanged, while that from other bodies decreased by 2000 Euros. In the final year, all income sources saw a fall, whereas only the amount of money stemming from coffee continued rising to double of that in the initial year surveyed.
In terms of annual expenditure of this public place, it saw a rise in the second stage by 8000 Euros before dropping to 71000 Euros in the final year. Profit of harkley Hall, similarly, witnessed a steady decrease from 9000 Euros in the initial stage to only 1000 Euros after 3 years period.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-02-17 | kingnight153 | 84 | view |
- The maps below show the village of Stokeford in 1930 and 2010. 84
- The table shows the maximum, minimum, and average monthly salaries in a European country in five employment sector in 2009, 78
- The two column charts below show the percentage of food and other items bought by three European countries in 1998 and 2008 77
- Healthcare should always be funded by governments, and it should always be free for peopleto use. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this idea? 84
- The charts below give information on the ages of people when they got married in one particular country in 1996 and 2008. 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
...f that in the initial year surveyed. In terms of annual expenditure of this pub...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, second, similarly, so, whereas, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 954.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 195.0 196.424390244 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.89230769231 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.22339482541 2.65546596893 84% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.558974358974 0.547539520022 102% => OK
syllable_count: 282.6 283.868780488 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Interrogative: 1.0 0.114634146341 872% => Less interrogative sentences wanted.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.3190047816 43.030603864 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.0 112.824112599 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 5.23603664747 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150306696537 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.075183949078 0.103423049105 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883394497406 0.0843802449381 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138137819 0.15604864568 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0944777425818 0.0819641961636 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 61.2550243902 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.3012195122 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.4140731707 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.24 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.