Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.
Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty.
Most researchers in any field of study are trying to pursue their goal to expand the limit of their study. Their goal or their purpose of research is not on the superficial, it is impact of conventional knowledge with innovational thoughts. However, it is hardly to implement innovational protocol within limits of investigation; indeed if there is boundary, it couldn’t have results that researchers want to have. Therefore, to understand hypothesis or to develop theory, there should not only be a limit that causes research but also on the immediate, practical application.
The process and introduction are very important to the research, and researchers believe that every investigation that they will have would be very helpful to improve process or introduction. If there is no financial aid, it couldn’t easily start a new form of research because when financial aid stops, research could stop in the middle of nowhere. Other circumstances that if there is any investigation of protocol, it will easily to go forward to the next level of their research.
As statement talked about research certainty, nobody can’t ascertain about the future conclusion of research. Whether it is abortive or marvelous conclusion, research will have at least small amount of clue that gives the tenor of research. Recently, archaeologist discovered one of the oldest human being on the earth. They found a fossil that formed almost similar outfit of human. However, they didn’t know that they would find this type of fossil.
In conclusion, discovery of any other fields is not easy foundation to prove. On the other hand, there can be refute that some of the research can have certainty of having an exact conclusion and only need their investigation. However, every clues are come from previous research and every expectation would come from aspects of their view, so they need some time to expect; it would be hard if there is no investigation to others types of research. Therefore, researchers should have investigation until they expect to discover their goals
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-06 | z.salahshoor | 66 | view |
| 2019-10-17 | luciano.pisa | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-18 | p30kh40 | 66 | view |
| 2019-08-17 | p30kh40 | 75 | view |
| 2019-07-28 | sanket007 | 66 | view |
- Any leader who is quickly and easily influenced by shifts in popular opinion will accomplish little. 50
- Claim: Researchers should not limit their investigations to only those areas in which they expect to discover something that has an immediate, practical application.Reason: It is impossible to predict the outcome of a line of research with any certainty. 50
- Claim: The best test of an argument is its ability to convince someone with an opposing viewpoint.Reason: Only by being forced to defend an idea against the doubts and contrasting views of others does on really discover the value of that idea. 62
- "Two studies of amphibians in Xanadu National Park confirm a significant decline in the numbers of amphibians. In 1975 there were seven species of amphibians in the park, and there were abundant numbers of each species. However, in 2002 only four species 50
- The following appeared in a memo from the marketing director of Top Dog Pet Stores."Five years ago, Fish Emporium started advertising in the magazine Exotic Pets Monthly. Their stores saw sales increase by 15 percent. The three Fish Emporium stores in Gul 50
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 8, column 123, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...he other hand, there can be refute that some of the research can have certainty of having a...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, at least, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.5258426966 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 12.4196629213 121% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 14.8657303371 61% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 11.3162921348 88% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 33.0505617978 94% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 58.6224719101 84% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 12.9106741573 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1756.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 334.0 442.535393258 75% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25748502994 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.02451527334 2.79657885939 108% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 215.323595506 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.523952095808 0.4932671777 106% => OK
syllable_count: 539.1 704.065955056 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 6.24550561798 144% => OK
Interrogative: 0.0 0.740449438202 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.38483146067 68% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 20.2370786517 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 23.0359550562 87% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.1274237576 60.3974514979 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.75 118.986275619 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.875 23.4991977007 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0625 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 10.2758426966 68% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 5.13820224719 58% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.83258426966 124% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.346501847275 0.243740707755 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.121955006519 0.0831039109588 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0726260996631 0.0758088955206 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21686006667 0.150359130593 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494298013707 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 48.8420337079 105% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 12.1743820225 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.1639044944 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 8.38706741573 97% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 100.480337079 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.8971910112 97% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 11.2143820225 89% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.7820224719 119% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.